I am writing to the devel list after first posting to the regular list
about using GtkBuilder and grouped widgets like a group of radio
buttons. The only post that really spoke to my problem mentioned that
there really isn't a way with GtkBuilder to deal nicely with groups of
widgets like radio bu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry to revive this again, but does anyone have a link to the
> discussion of this? My google search is failing me.
>
> It seems strange to me that GTK goes to a lot of trouble to support
> accessibility (atk and friends), but then has a homepage which breaks
> W3C acc
Philippe De Swert wrote:
> What annoys me the most (especially on my wide-screen monitor) is that I have
> a very thin GTK+ website which requires me to scroll down a lot. And I don't
> like to have to view a website in 10:16 screen as it is quite unpractical. It
> is pretty hard to swivel a 22" sc
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 21:34 +0200, Richard Hult wrote:
> Michael L Torrie wrote:
> > Although Leopard is just about to be released, I am still on Panther.
> > In the bug tracker there is a list of Tiger-specific calls that prevent
> > GTK from being compiled on Panther. T
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 20:27 +0200, Richard Hult wrote:
> It is moving along pretty nicely currently, there are a couple of bigger
> issues that need sorting out (most notably popups with grabs), but it's
> getting there.
>
> Regarding pygtk, that should work pretty much like C apps, there is
>
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:05 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> It might be advantagous if alot of the glib data structures
> were moved somewhere above libgobject in the stack (glibutils ?),
> this way they could have the option of being gobject based,
> opening a whole new world of possible code p
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 20:00 +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
> > This wouldn't work too well. MS Windows just doesn't have much of an
> > icon "style" to begin with. Microsoft seem to rework their icons for
> > each new Windows release, causing a lot of visual disparity among all
> > the applications targe
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 11:33 -0500, Yevgen Muntyan wrote:
> Um, we can do that only if we have the icon. And that's a
> problem. If someone volunteers to draw missing icons for
> me then I'll be glad, but until then I will use gtk-about for
> bookmarks and gtk-select-font for "Configure Shortcuts"
>
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 21:38 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> After playing with Gedit a bit I think GTK+ isn't up to the task of
> scrolling fast enough to achieve that.
I disagree. All you have to do is drag the scroll bar to see exactly
how fast and smooth, pixel-per-pixel scrolling can be.
>
>
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 15:54 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 07:37 +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
> > A few years ago there used to be a distributor patch in Gentoo to enable
> > this, and it was sweet. What happened, here?
>
> I dunno, but it's more than sweet. Whoever remember the t
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 14:22 +0100, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am writing an article for the O'Reilly Network on getting GTK+
> to work on Apple's OS X operating system. I am familiar with a number
> of resources, for example Imendio's web site and build script, and
> the pdf by Anders
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 14:36 -0300, Luis Ariel Lecca wrote:
> Could someone give me any hit with this, please ?
It is almost certainly not a but in GTK.
This type of problem comes up very frequently. Invariably it is a
conflict between the distro install of gtk and this one you are building
yo
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 16:00 +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Dominic Lachowicz writes:
> > I have Gaim, Gimp, Gnumeric, Glade-3, Workrave, gQview, and Xchat all
> > using the same GTK+ runtime on WinXP, and they all work flawlessly.
>
> Yeah, but you are an expert, and know what you are doing ;) Po
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 21:09 +0100, John Cupitt wrote:
> There's a project page with a TODO list of things that still need fixing:
>
> http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/Gtk_Mac_OS_X
I may be the only guy who rarely upgrades an OS (especially one that
costs $120 a pop), so I'm still running on Pant
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 21:40 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> before people get the impression that Carol would be speaking for the
> GIMP developers, I think I better say something as well...
>
> GIMP has been brought up as an example of an application that has
> multiple menubars (albeit not
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 19:33 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 10:31 -0700, Michael L Torrie wrote:
> > I believe that simply taking the focused window's GtkMenuBar is
> > impractical because there's nothing that says that an window must only
> > have
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 12:19 -0500, Dominic Lachowicz wrote:
> I'm sorry for what may be a stupid question. Why do we need a bridge
> API (assuming that there's a 1:1 mapping between Cocoa and GTK+ menus)
> if we're already putting the onus on developers to:
You know, I don't know. I do know there
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 11:44 -0500, John Ehresman wrote:
> A separate api is probably needed. OS X applications can and should
> display menu bars when no top-level windows are open. Also the
> preferences, quit, and possibly other items should be on the menu with
> the applications name on it
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 03:46 -0800, Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
> Looking good so far; I just got it all compiled. gtk-demo runs, though
> with a bunch of visual glitches (BG of many windows is black, BG of
> parts of scrollbars is black, etc.). If I have some more time, I'd love
> to try and tac
19 matches
Mail list logo
