Re: Stock Items Deprecation

2013-09-13 Thread Matthew Brush
On 13-09-13 02:29 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: hi; On 13 September 2013 03:10, Matthew Brush wrote: As some of you may have noticed we have recently deprecated Stock Items in master. Some details on this change may be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d

Re: Stock Items Deprecation

2013-09-12 Thread Matthew Brush
y asking what is the purpose of you asking this question? Will it change the mass-deprecations? Cheers, Matthew Brush ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Re: GTK+3 Win32 Bundles : RFC

2013-09-08 Thread Matthew Brush
doesn't matter too much as long as the left-out binaries/libraries are available as compatible separate downloads. P.S. Thanks for working on this. Cheers, Matthew Brush ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome

Re: Stock Items Deprecation

2013-08-20 Thread Matthew Brush
On 13-08-20 06:59 PM, Matthew Brush wrote: On 13-07-02 06:41 AM, William Jon McCann wrote: Hi, As some of you may have noticed we have recently deprecated Stock Items in master. Some details on this change may be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d

Re: Stock Items Deprecation

2013-08-20 Thread Matthew Brush
what, stock icons will be deprecated" (paraphrasing) ... which if true, makes me wonder what is the purpose of this thread asking for people's opinions about the deprecation? It almost sounds like circular reasoning. P.S. Sorry if I missed some huge "master plan" document

Re: Stock Items Deprecation

2013-07-17 Thread Matthew Brush
quot;, which is I think pretty much what Jean was griping about. Cheers, Matthew Brush ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Re: GtkColorButton Deprecation

2013-04-12 Thread Matthew Brush
x3636), RGB(0x, 0x, 0x0000), // ... }; Cheers, Matthew Brush ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Re: Is GTK+ a cross-platform toolkit ? (fwd)

2013-03-05 Thread Matthew Brush
round here. I also begin to have a good experience in NSIS which I use to produce installers (see links at the end of this mail). I can definitely take care of a long-term and evolving GTK+ bundle. This would be fantastic! Cheers, Matthew Brush ___ gtk-

Re: supporting all X (not only gtk+) applications in browser

2013-01-08 Thread Matthew Brush
ey can use them! In this way, all data is stored on the cloud, rather than constantly synch-ing with the server! Hi, You should try out VNC and/or remote X displays, I think they're exactly what you're describing if I understand correctly. Cheers, Matthew Brush

Re: glib-mkenums in glib 2

2013-01-04 Thread Matthew Brush
"print(sys.path)" to see which paths I mean). There's good docs about this on python.org (as well as all kinds of other excellent docs/tuts). Good luck, Matthew Brush ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Re: Guidelines for stable branch changes in GLib/Gtk

2012-11-11 Thread Matthew Brush
: there's a bunch of dupes in the list because it shows the extent to which this also disrupted applications (which the bugs then (rightly) got re-assigned/marked as duplicates). Cheers, Matthew Brush ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-deve

Re: notifications in gtk

2012-11-06 Thread Matthew Brush
ly per-application. * No matter what, it shouldn't use the clichéd semi-transparent black overlays/HUD/OSD that everyone is using lately :) Regular old dialog boxes (with or without window decorations) have the advantage here since they'll naturally fit in with the users theme.

Re: The new GTask name in GIO is wrong

2012-11-02 Thread Matthew Brush
On 12-11-02 06:11 PM, Matthew Brush wrote: On 12-11-02 07:46 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: hi; On 2 November 2012 14:15, Tal Hadad wrote: First, there were an old project called GTask[0], which tried to give parallelism ability and alternative to today GIO async(I think it wasn't exist

Re: The new GTask name in GIO is wrong

2012-11-02 Thread Matthew Brush
etty sure no one is using that :) P.S. In case the smileys didn't give it away I'm mostly being facetious. Cheers, Matthew Brush [1] I'm assuming it's not since I've read a lot of G*-stack documentation and tutorials and don't remember seeing. Apologies in advance

Re: next steps for touch support in GTK+

2012-08-03 Thread Matthew Brush
n a separate library? In terms of usability, desktop and mobile interfaces are completely different beasts and "bastardizing"[1] (not my word) one toolkit type into the other is bound to make everyone annoyed. Cheers, Matthew Brush (random GTK-app developer and armchair critic) [1] h

Re: Default size for Labels

2012-06-11 Thread Matthew Brush
;Go 100%" for this widget? Here is one way: https://github.com/geany/geany/blob/master/src/geanywraplabel.c Cheers, Matthew Brush ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Re: touch events

2012-02-02 Thread Matthew Brush
m really sick of this Java non-sense and would *love* to write Android apps using GTK+. Cheers, Matthew Brush ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Re: RFC: new features

2012-01-11 Thread Matthew Brush
doing it yourself. This could be used in the next one... NOTEBOOK IMPROVEMENTS See Firefox. I think that's it. Cheers, Matthew Brush [1] http://scentric.net/tutorial/treeview-tutorial.html ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.or

Re: GI Help

2011-12-19 Thread Matthew Brush
r projects that use it successfully or use something else altogether. Cheers, Matthew Brush Regard Bijan Binaee On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:15 AM, mailto:jr...@curious-computing.com>> wrote: > Hi > > Thanks for your reply first > > i need bind to j

Re: GMenuModel has landed

2011-12-12 Thread Matthew Brush
On 12/12/2011 10:45 AM, Ryan Lortie wrote: On Sun, 2011-12-11 at 18:24 -0800, Matthew Brush wrote: My (probably misguided) opinion is that if this type of stuff can't go into GTK+ for some reason, there should be a `glib-ui` or `glib-gnome` library or something like this. I have doubt

Re: GMenuModel has landed

2011-12-11 Thread Matthew Brush
lib-ui` or `glib-gnome` library or something like this. I have doubts how many apps linking to GIO without GTK+ are going to need such a model, either because they don't have a UI at all or are using some other toolkit which likely provides a mechanism of its own for this. Cheers, Matth