I would hope iterators and models will be part of glib 3.0 to avoid 3rd
party duplication as well as all other Libgee functionality
this would also make it more vala friendly
jamie
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 19:16 +0200, Szilárd Pfeiffer wrote:
> What do you want to do with that? What about GNode?
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 21:49 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Jamie McCracken
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Are you saying Yacc/Bison and lex/flex source files which generate c
> > files are also incompatible with GPL?
>
> Of
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 21:18 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > What about a libvala? I guess vala is supposed to have this property
> > that it doesn't create dependencies in distributed tarballs, but that
> > design go
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 21:07 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Yu Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > First, it is very difficult to manage a string without a reference
> > count. The current vala implementation is to assume that strings are
> > immutable, an
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 13:37 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why explore alternate ideas? Some downsides to GIterator-as-gobject:
>
> * GObject is pretty heavyweight for something like this, and moreover
> right now libglib doesn't depend on libgobject
> * the need to unref the iterator
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 15:55 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 16:16 +0200, Christian Dywan wrote:
> > What about Genie even?
> >
> > [indent=4]
> > uses
> > Glib
> >
> > class Foo : Object
> >
> > init
> > var bar = 0
>
> That doesn't define a property.
>
This
