nit_ctor"
#endif
I've attached my current patch.
--
albert chin (ch...@thewrittenword.com)
Index: glib/gconstructor.h
===
--- glib/gconstructor.h.orig 2016-02-28 14:04:14.0 +
+++ glib/gconstructor.h 2016-02
ummy1 0
field_int8 1
dummy2 2
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
dummy8 64
field_size 72
dummy9 80
-field_time 84
+field_time 88
OffsetsEnum: size=48, alignment=4
enum1 0
gmake[6]: *** [check-local] Error 1
Any hints on how to debug this? Tru64 UNIX is a native 64-bit system.
--
albert chi
What's the purpose of LPATH=.libs in gobject-introspection? For HP-UX,
when LPATH is set, it replaces the default search path for libraries.
So, LPATH=.libs with -lpthread will not search /usr/lib for
libpthread.sl.
--
albert chin (ch...@thewrittenwor
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:12:06PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 at 12:48:35 -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> > We've built gobject-introspection-0.10.8 on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, IRIX, Tru64
> > UNIX, and RHEL. We have it compiling everywhere except AIX.
>
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:28:45PM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 01:46:59PM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:12:06PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 at 12:48:35 -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> > > > We&
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 01:46:59PM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:12:06PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 at 12:48:35 -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> > > We've built gobject-introspection-0.10.8 on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, IRIX,
>
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:12:06PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 at 12:48:35 -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> > We've built gobject-introspection-0.10.8 on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, IRIX, Tru64
> > UNIX, and RHEL. We have it compiling everywhere except AIX.
>
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:12:06PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 at 12:48:35 -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> > We've built gobject-introspection-0.10.8 on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, IRIX, Tru64
> > UNIX, and RHEL. We have it compiling everywhere except AIX.
>
t;, line 43, in
sys.exit(scanner_main(sys.argv))
File "../giscanner/scannermain.py", line 412, in scanner_main
main.transform()
File "../giscanner/maintransformer.py", line 59, in transform
self._namespace.walk(self._pass_fixup_hidden_fields)
File "../giscanner/ast.py", line 435, in walk
node.walk(callback, [])
File "../giscanner/ast.py", line 511, in walk
res = callback(self, chain)
File "../giscanner/maintransformer.py", line 117, in _pass_fixup_hidden_fields
if (field.name.startswith('_')
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'startswith'
gmake[2]: *** [GIMarshallingTests-1.0.gir] Error 1
gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/build/gobject-introspection-0.10.8/tests'
--
albert chin (ch...@thewrittenword.com)
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
...
int n_attach_points;
int *attach_points;
...
} Image;
Are you sure you want image->attach_points above and not
image->n_attach_points?
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
--
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Albert Chin
> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 9:40 AM
> To: gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
> Subject: strtod-test.c and atof("NaN")
>
> The HP-UX 10.20 atof() and strtod() don't parse
> atof("NaN")/
: assertion failed: (isnan (our_nan))
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:17:15AM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 19:37 -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:07:16PM -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> > > * --preview flag for evince which adds a print button and other print
>
UX 10.20 or
some older platforms where GNOME cannot be built.
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
a backend interface, and the long term plan is to
> make it a module (like immodules or pixbuf loaders). However at the
> moment its just linked in.
So, what about systems without CUPS?
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
___
gtk-devel-list ma
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 09:52:40PM -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> In terms of the impact on people compiling GTK+, I'd be interested
> in hearing from the people at "The Written Word", who compile GTK+
> across a pretty big range of older platforms; is Albert Chin
acobs for details...)
>
> I think relying on CUPS might be good enough. Opinions on this? Does
> e.g. solaris ship CUPS?
So older systems like Tru64 UNIX, HP-UX 11.00, 11.11, AIX 5.1, 5.2
will require CUPS to be installed? Ugh.
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
gt; compiles for the old 32bit ABI (which I sometimes need to do) it uses
> an old, outdated and unmaintained version of the compiler. There
> are certainly less issues with GCC according to my experience.
We built gtk+-2.6.8 with MIPSpro 7.4.3m without any problems.
--
alb
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 02:22:17PM +0200, Magnus Bergman wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:48:25 -0500
> Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:41:19PM +0200, Magnus Bergman wrote:
> > > I have problems building glib (2.6.6) in Irix us
U ld even recommended for building GCC no IRIX? I don't think so.
GNU ld isn't feature-complete on IRIX:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-06/msg00621.html
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@
20 matches
Mail list logo
