Sorry, the problem is in my application, not g_module_open().
I do g_module_open() for the same .so file twice ...
KC
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Kuang-Chun Cheng
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did the following test:
>
> g_module_open()
> ... do something make sure g_module_open() success ...
> g_modu
Hi,
I did the following test:
g_module_open()
... do something make sure g_module_open() success ...
g_module_close()
... remove the .so file
g_module_open()
And I found the 2nd g_module_open() still success even the .so file
is removed !!!
It looks like the g_module_open() will cache the librar
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 15:45 -0400, Andrew Paprocki wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Andrew Paprocki wrote:
> > I checked gvalue.h and I don't see a #define in there containing the
> > proper initializer list for a GValue to prevent gcc warnings. Rather
> > than duplicating "GValue v
On 03/28/2009 01:22 PM, Yu Feng wrote:
Dear List,
I noticed this line in gtklabel.c:
gtk_label_ensure_layout:
...
if (angle != 0.0&& !label->wrap&& !label->ellipsize&& !
label->select_info)
{
/* We rotate the standard singleton PangoContext for the widget,
* depend
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:02:37 +
Xavier Toth wrote:
> I've got some python code in which I'm trying to use
> gdk_X11_get_default_xdisplay but it fails intermittently returning a
> bad pointer. I don't believe that this problem has anything to do with
> python. Have others experienced this and i
Am Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:45:55 +0100
schrieb Andreas Nilsson :
> Christian Dywan wrote:
> > Am Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:22:42 +0100
> > schrieb Mike Massonnet :
> >
> >> Le Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:54:41 +0100,
> >> Sven Herzberg a écrit :
> >>
> >>> Am Samstag, den 28.03.2009, 12:37 +0100 schrieb Ch
Dear List,
I noticed this line in gtklabel.c:
gtk_label_ensure_layout:
...
if (angle != 0.0 && !label->wrap && !label->ellipsize && !
label->select_info)
{
/* We rotate the standard singleton PangoContext for the widget,
* depending on the fact that it's meant pretty much
I've got some python code in which I'm trying to use
gdk_X11_get_default_xdisplay but it fails intermittently returning a
bad pointer. I don't believe that this problem has anything to do with
python. Have others experienced this and if so are there any
workarounds? Is this a know issue? I'm runnin
Christian Dywan wrote:
Am Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:22:42 +0100
schrieb Mike Massonnet :
Le Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:54:41 +0100,
Sven Herzberg a écrit :
Am Samstag, den 28.03.2009, 12:37 +0100 schrieb Christian Dywan:
Am Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:38:12 -0700
schrieb "Eugenia Loli-Queru" :
Am Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:22:42 +0100
schrieb Mike Massonnet :
> Le Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:54:41 +0100,
> Sven Herzberg a écrit :
>
> > Am Samstag, den 28.03.2009, 12:37 +0100 schrieb Christian Dywan:
> > > Am Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:38:12 -0700
> > > schrieb "Eugenia Loli-Queru" :
> > > > So, what about
Le Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:54:41 +0100,
Sven Herzberg a écrit :
> Am Samstag, den 28.03.2009, 12:37 +0100 schrieb Christian Dywan:
> > Am Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:38:12 -0700
> > schrieb "Eugenia Loli-Queru" :
> > > So, what about that link? :-)
> >
> > Here's a patch. I'm not quite sure who decides if w
Am Samstag, den 28.03.2009, 12:37 +0100 schrieb Christian Dywan:
> Am Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:38:12 -0700
> schrieb "Eugenia Loli-Queru" :
> > So, what about that link? :-)
>
> Here's a patch. I'm not quite sure who decides if we can change it
> back, but it's ready to go.
I don't think we should fav
Am Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:38:12 -0700
schrieb "Eugenia Loli-Queru" :
> >excuse me if this wasn't intentional but I think your tone is
> inappropriate here.
>
> I didn't see anything wrong with my tone on my previous email! I
> don't understand why you saw it as hostile!
> [...]
> > And if you are wi
13 matches
Mail list logo
