From: "Vincent Untz", Date: 14/02/2009 01:25 :
> Le mercredi 11 février 2009, à 11:31 +, Alberto Ruiz a écrit :
>> 2009/2/11 Matthias Clasen ;:
>>> This would allow us to move forward with several things in GTK+ that
>>> will work much better if they can use DBus:
>>> - session support
>>> - u
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> - Show quoted text -
> On 02/13/2009 07:52 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Hubert Figuiere
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> gtk_label_parse_uline() is marked as deprecated but does not seem to have
>>> a
On 02/13/2009 07:52 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
Hi,
gtk_label_parse_uline() is marked as deprecated but does not seem to have a
replacement. Is there any plan to replace it?
I'm trying to cleanup the code in AbiWord to build without depr
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> gtk_label_parse_uline() is marked as deprecated but does not seem to have a
> replacement. Is there any plan to replace it?
>
> I'm trying to cleanup the code in AbiWord to build without deprecated GTK,
> but this one seems to be
Hi,
gtk_label_parse_uline() is marked as deprecated but does not seem to
have a replacement. Is there any plan to replace it?
I'm trying to cleanup the code in AbiWord to build without deprecated
GTK, but this one seems to be a no go.
Any idea beside copying the code from Gtk directly to A
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Stefan Kost wrote:
> hi,
> Matthias Clasen schrieb:
>> With 2.20 winding down, I think now would be a good time to talk about
>> what should happen in Glib 2.22.
>
> What about
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348080
> "GObject property bindings like in
hi,
Matthias Clasen schrieb:
> With 2.20 winding down, I think now would be a good time to talk about
> what should happen in Glib 2.22.
What about
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348080
"GObject property bindings like in libexo"
there is a patch attached. This is one of the feature tha
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
>> In the end I don't expect the use of dbus in the rest of the glib/gtk+
>> stack API to be visible (but maybe I'm naive here).
...
> That being said, I'd expect that at least for some of the anticipated
> use cases of
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
>> Would DBus be swappable here for something else on non freedesktop
>> environments? (Windows, Mac)
>
> Just wondering if an easy way like "make this API UNIX-only" is an
> option that can be considered?
>
> In the end I don't expect the use
Le mercredi 11 février 2009, à 11:31 +, Alberto Ruiz a écrit :
> 2009/2/11 Matthias Clasen :
> > With 2.20 winding down, I think now would be a good time to talk about
> > what should happen in Glib 2.22.
> >
> > One thing that has been tossed around for a long time is that it would
> > be real
Hi,
Thanks for your response. I downloaded the earlier version of GTK+ -
1.12.0 - and tried to build this with DirectFB support.
But this time I get the following error:
Any ideas what I am doing wrong? Am I missing some additional libraries
that are needed to build the GTK+ libraries?
gdkcursor-
Dear Eade
Support for DirectFB in recent GTK+ releases is broken: IIRC GTK+ 2.12
is the latest release with a working DirectFB backend.
BTW, you may want to resort to the precompiled binaries for ARM which
can be found in the debian repositories.
Attilio
Eade, Sean (SCR US) ha scritto:
Hi A
12 matches
Mail list logo
