Hi,
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lemme pull a real-world example: Last year I had to fix a bug in Firefox where
> a page with a nul byte crashed the browser.
What I don't see is how a nul byte is in any way different from an
invalid sequence, other
Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Brian J. Tarricone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think what he really meant (or if not, here's my take on it) was that NUL
>> bytes aren't *printable* text... like you'd say of low-value ASCII data.
>> Sure, it's technically "tex
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> Dan Winship wrote:
>> Maciej Katafiasz wrote:
>>> Den Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:55:29 -0400 skrev Behdad Esfahbod:
Ugh. Why is that? Who knows? Matthias suggested that because a string
claiming to be length bytes long but terminating prematurely is not
valid. Ho
Dan Winship wrote:
> Maciej Katafiasz wrote:
>> Den Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:55:29 -0400 skrev Behdad Esfahbod:
>>> Ugh. Why is that? Who knows? Matthias suggested that because a string
>>> claiming to be length bytes long but terminating prematurely is not
>>> valid. However, that statement assumes
Maciej Katafiasz wrote:
> Den Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:55:29 -0400 skrev Behdad Esfahbod:
>> Ugh. Why is that? Who knows? Matthias suggested that because a string
>> claiming to be length bytes long but terminating prematurely is not
>> valid. However, that statement assumes that string is nul-termin
2008/10/8 Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 21:52 +, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
>> In the future (3.0 maybe?) it would be cool if there was a Sequence
>> interface that container widgets could implement. That way it would be
>> more explicit how containers should be impleme
Maciej Katafiasz wrote:
>>> Another possibility mentioned was making more use of GString.
>> Not a huge fan.
>
> Why's that? GString is a very odd animal, we have it, it works fine and
> is as good a string implementation and as compatible with char* as
> possible within C, yet it seems to be us
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 09.10.2008, 00:01 + schrieb Maciej Katafiasz:
> Den Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:55:29 -0400 skrev Behdad Esfahbod:
> > coda wrote:
> >> Another possibility mentioned was making more use of GString.
> >
> > Not a huge fan.
>
> Why's that? GString is a very odd animal, we have i
Den Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:55:29 -0400 skrev Behdad Esfahbod:
> coda wrote:
>> I discussed this on #gtk+ with mathrick and pbor and it seems that the
>> assumption that UTF-8 strings are NUL-terminated and contain no NULs
>> runs pretty deep. A possible solution is to use "modified UTF-8" (
>> http:/
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 13:20, Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Brian J. Tarricone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think what he really meant (or if not, here's my take on it) was that NUL
>> bytes aren't *printable* text... like you'd say of low-value
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> there's another project called [1]Manju (also with code [2]available),
> which seems to use SVG instead of CSS. Could you comment on the
> differences between these approaches, if you know them ?
Quoting from [1]:
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 11:36 +0200, Robert Staudinger wrote:
> This should provide some insight on what I'm up to. Let me know what
> you think, and maybe the Dublin hackfest can be used to bring things
> on track.
there's another project called [1]Manju (also with code [2]available),
which s
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Brian J. Tarricone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think what he really meant (or if not, here's my take on it) was that NUL
> bytes aren't *printable* text... like you'd say of low-value ASCII data.
> Sure, it's technically "text," but most of it isn't somethin
Hello,
After the CSS engine [1] has gained some traction -- at least in terms
of code -- I'd like to lay out a possible plan for theming in gtk3.
First up, some (well known) issues to consider:
(1) "Suboptimal Theming in GTK" [2]
(2) "Themes are Evil!" [3, 4]
(3) Lookalike widget/toolkit im
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 21:52 +, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
> In the future (3.0 maybe?) it would be cool if there was a Sequence
> interface that container widgets could implement. That way it would be
> more explicit how containers should be implemented. And other
> list-like widgets could also imp
15 matches
Mail list logo
