2008/9/7 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>> I'm leaning towards using the "ownership" terminology instead of "transfer".
>>> typedef enum {
>>>GI_OWNERSHIP_CALLER, /* caller owns it, caller should free it after use
>>> */
>>>GI_OWNERSHIP_CALLEE /* callee owns it, caller should leave
On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 17:01 +0200, Johan Dahlin wrote:
> Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 09:35 +0200, Johan Dahlin wrote:
> >> I'm proud to announce the initial release of GObject-Introspection.
> >> Colin Walters and I have been hacking madly on it for the past couple of
> >> w
>> I'm leaning towards using the "ownership" terminology instead of "transfer".
>> typedef enum {
>>GI_OWNERSHIP_CALLER, /* caller owns it, caller should free it after use */
>>GI_OWNERSHIP_CALLEE /* callee owns it, caller should leave it as it is */
>> } GITypeOwnership;
>
> Just as a
Paul Pogonyshev wrote:
Johan Dahlin wrote:
[...]
> I'm leaning towards using the "ownership" terminology instead of "transfer".
typedef enum {
GI_OWNERSHIP_CALLER, /* caller owns it, caller should free it after use */
GI_OWNERSHIP_CALLEE /* callee owns it, caller should leave it as it
Johan Dahlin wrote:
> [...]
>
> I'm leaning towards using the "ownership" terminology instead of "transfer".
>
> typedef enum {
>GI_OWNERSHIP_CALLER, /* caller owns it, caller should free it after use */
>GI_OWNERSHIP_CALLEE /* callee owns it, caller should leave it as it is */
> } GITy
Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 09:35 +0200, Johan Dahlin wrote:
I'm proud to announce the initial release of GObject-Introspection.
Colin Walters and I have been hacking madly on it for the past couple of
weeks and we have finally reached a point to where we're ready for more
m
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 09:35 +0200, Johan Dahlin wrote:
> I'm proud to announce the initial release of GObject-Introspection.
> Colin Walters and I have been hacking madly on it for the past couple of
> weeks and we have finally reached a point to where we're ready for more
> more users.
>
> Tarba
