Re: gnome canvas doesnt work properly on GTK-DirectFB

2008-06-11 Thread svalbard colaco
Hi Paul, K.. can you tell me what exactly the changes are ? I wanted to try the same in my libgnomecanvas too. As to what i can understand from our previous conversations ;changes were made in *gnome-canvas.c* in function *static void paint (GnomeCanvas *canvas) *and commented out the line *gt

Re: gdkpixbufloader-API shortcoming

2008-06-11 Thread Dominic Lachowicz
A possible (though non-optimal) solution is to create 2 loaders - 1 for image/x-foo and 1 for image/x-bar. You can share 99% of the code, and then pass the mime type to your decoder function, based on which DLL got invoked. This is what the GDI+ based loaders do on Windows, for instance. Best, Dom

gdkpixbufloader-API shortcoming

2008-06-11 Thread Magnus Bergman
A small shortcoming in the gdkpixbufloader-API causes me trouble. The problem is this: Let's say my loader libpixbufloader-foobar can handle the two (very similar) formats image/x-foo and image/x-bar. Then an application identifies an image as either foo or bar it invokes my loader. But the loader

Re: [compiz] color management spec

2008-06-11 Thread Owen Taylor
[ Intentionally not trimming quoting much due to various bounces from lists ] On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 09:05 +0200, Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote: > Am 10.06.08, 17:56 -0400 schrieb Owen Taylor: > > On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 16:43 +0200, Tomas Carnecky wrote: > > > Added gtk-devel-list@gnome.org to hear their o

Re: [compiz] color management spec

2008-06-11 Thread Kai-Uwe Behrmann
Am 10.06.08, 17:56 -0400 schrieb Owen Taylor: > On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 16:43 +0200, Tomas Carnecky wrote: > > Added gtk-devel-list@gnome.org to hear their opinion about this matter. > > For reference, this is what I proposed: > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2008-May/035772.html > >

Re: gnome canvas doesnt work properly on GTK-DirectFB

2008-06-11 Thread Paul Davis
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 20:26 +0530, svalbard colaco wrote: > Hi Paul, > k. > So the "fix" you spoke about was in your application code and not in > your GTK-quartz backend? its in my own modified version of libgnomecanvas, which is distributed on OS X as part of the app bundle. _

Re: gnome canvas doesnt work properly on GTK-DirectFB

2008-06-11 Thread svalbard colaco
Hi Paul, k. So the "fix" you spoke about was in your application code and not in your GTK-quartz backend? CMIIMW. On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 19:55 +0530, svalbard colaco wrote: > > HI all; > > > > Further debugging has show

Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0

2008-06-11 Thread Michael Natterer
[resending since the original reply somehow got lost] On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 09:44 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 13:34 +0200, Kristian Rietveld wrote: [snip] > We should start to enforce the usage of single header includes and not > make this optional. Mitch has been working

Re: gnome canvas doesnt work properly on GTK-DirectFB

2008-06-11 Thread Paul Davis
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 19:55 +0530, svalbard colaco wrote: > HI all; > > Further debugging has shown that antialiased canvases formed using > gnome_canvas_new_aa() appear correctly on GTK-DFB backend > whereas canvases formed using gnome_canvas_new() fail to render on > GTK-DirectFB ;rather they

Re: gnome canvas doesnt work properly on GTK-DirectFB

2008-06-11 Thread svalbard colaco
HI all; Further debugging has shown that *antialiased canvases* formed using *gnome_canvas_new_aa() *appear correctly on GTK-DFB backend whereas canvases formed using *gnome_canvas_new()* fail to render on GTK-DirectFB ;rather they appear black instead of white. Hoping this will give a clearer i