On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2008, Yair Hershkovitz wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> For those who are still not familiar with the issue, you have a lot to
>> read in bug #503071 comments.
>>
>> I would like to explain my view of the un-allowed commits
On Tue, 20 May 2008, Yair Hershkovitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For those who are still not familiar with the issue, you have a lot to
> read in bug #503071 comments.
>
> I would like to explain my view of the un-allowed commits I've done in
> glib and gtk+.
Thanks for the patch and your input Yair, but f
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 11:41 +0300, Yair Hershkovitz wrote:
>
> At this point I've received two requests to revert my commit, and one
> question asking why I hadn't revert it.
Consider this the ultimate request then. Revert now, or I'll talk to the
accounts group to have your svn access removed.
vronskij wrote:
> Hi,
Hi :)
> I have created a non trivial gtk+ tutorial
>
> http://zetcode.com/tutorials/gtktutorial/
>
> and would like to ask you to add a link to it on the gtk.org site, under
> documentation/tutorials section.
>
> It could look like:
>
> The GTK+ programming tutorial
>
>
Hi,
For those who are still not familiar with the issue, you have a lot to
read in bug #503071 comments.
I would like to explain my view of the un-allowed commits I've done in
glib and gtk+.
First I'd like to make it clear that my intentions are not to cause
chaos, and especially not to do any h
