Le samedi 15 mars 2008 à 21:43 +0100, Christian Persch a écrit :
> Hi Jean;
>
> Am Samstag, den 15.03.2008, 21:09 +0100 schrieb Jean Bréfort:
> > Hmm, and what will happen to applications using at least one GPLv2-only
> > libraries?
>
> This might indeed pose a problem, though I'm not sure how m
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My take on it is that it's breaking our interface. I'd fine if we tell
> the world that we are going to do the switch in three years from now and
> stick to it, but changing tomorrow is like changing stable API tom
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> My take on it is that it's breaking our interface. I'd fine if we tell
> the world that we are going to do the switch in three years from now and
> stick to it, but changing tomorrow is like changing stable API tomorrow.
> Just deprecate the old license now, remove it in 3
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 21:48 +0100, Tim Janik wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Andrew Cowie wrote:
>
> > This topic was discussed recently on foundation-list.
> >
> > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/foundation-list/2008-March/msg00032.html
> >
> > In summary, attempting to relicence the library would b
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Andrew Cowie wrote:
> This topic was discussed recently on foundation-list.
>
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/foundation-list/2008-March/msg00032.html
>
> In summary, attempting to relicence the library would be, in practise,
> impossible.
>
> No further benefit is gained by
Hi Jean;
Am Samstag, den 15.03.2008, 21:09 +0100 schrieb Jean Bréfort:
> Hmm, and what will happen to applications using at least one GPLv2-only
> libraries?
This might indeed pose a problem, though I'm not sure how major it is. I
have to admit that it is however not a theoretical problem, since
Hi;
Am Samstag, den 15.03.2008, 21:16 +0100 schrieb Andrew Cowie:
> This topic was discussed recently on foundation-list.
>
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/foundation-list/2008-March/msg00032.html
>
> In summary, attempting to relicence the library would be, in practise,
> impossible.
Your lin
This topic was discussed recently on foundation-list.
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/foundation-list/2008-March/msg00032.html
In summary, attempting to relicence the library would be, in practise,
impossible.
No further benefit is gained by discussing this topic further.
AfC
Berlin
signature
Hmm, and what will happen to applications using at least one GPLv2-only
libraries?
Regards,
Jean
Le samedi 15 mars 2008 à 21:03 +0100, ryan lortie a écrit :
> Hello.
>
> After some talk at the Hackfest about it, I'm writing the list to
> officially request that glib and GTK be moved to LGPL "ver
Hello.
After some talk at the Hackfest about it, I'm writing the list to
officially request that glib and GTK be moved to LGPL "version 3 or
later".
The reasons for this are the increased clarity in the language of the
license plus the ability to accept LGPL3 code into glib/gtk ((since it
seems l
Thanks I'll look at the gnome-settings-daemon. A little background,
the problem I'm looking to address is the one related to MCS/MLS
policy in the SELinux world where you are copying and pasting between
windows of different contexts and or levels. In particular my concern
is MLS where you need a 'm
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Xavier Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm working on a secure selection manager based on glipper. What it
> needs to be able to do is intervene and make a security determination
> when a paste is requested. 'glipper' currently monitors clipboard
> ownership ch
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 4:18 AM, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Relatedly, I believe we should also consider bundling the 'native'
> > pixbuf loaders that have seen the light of day recently.
>
> Sure. Will do soonish for the Win32 GDI+ one.
I've just committed proper support for
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> 2008/3/13 Alberto Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> * Engines: both needs some love, the win32 one is almost into an acceptable
>> shape, whereas the Mac OS X one still nees some love, although it's getting
>> along pretty well.
>
> There is an os x theme engine ? Where is
> Relatedly, I believe we should also consider bundling the 'native'
> pixbuf loaders that have seen the light of day recently.
Sure. Will do soonish for the Win32 GDI+ one.
--tml
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gn
15 matches
Mail list logo
