Hi,
I'm developing Cutter(*) that is an unit testing framework
for C to write tests more easily and simply.
(*): http://cutter.sf.net/
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Test Framework Mini Tutorial" on Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:14:57 +0100 (CET),
Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The main goals in writ
On Dec 14, 2007 7:21 PM, David Zeuthen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - build fixes since only gio/gio.h can be included now
>(btw, should gio.h conditionally include the UNIX specific bits? This
> is not the case right now; I manually have to unclude gunixmounts.h)
No. We generally leave
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 19:25 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> I've attached the patch to this mail. Thanks for reviewing it.
And here's a patch that fixes a leak. Goes on top of the previous one.
Sorry about that. Thanks!
David
diff --git a/src/gtkfilesystemgvfs.c b/src/gtkfilesystemgvfs.c
ind
Hey Carlos,
Here's a patch that makes the GTK+ gvfs file chooser backend correctly
use the volume monitor and make it act like the Nautilus places sidebar.
Which is how the gnome-vfs GTK+ file chooser backend in libgnomeui
currently works. Notably
- unmounted media is shown and if you double cli
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 03:22 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Here we go with the patches for the hal volume monitoring backend:
>
> http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/gio.patch
> http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/nautilus.patch
> http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/gvfs.pat
On Dec 14, 2007 3:27 AM, Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anything that has cancellable operations (things like libsoup or
> whateveR) should use GCancellable. And GAsyncResult is a very powerful
> pattern for doing async operation that all libraries with async
> operations should ta
Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 14:50 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
>
>> Alexander Larsson wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:46 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
>>>
Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 17:48 +0100, Michael Natte
Here you go:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=503602
Did you have a chance to look at it?
Greets,
Lieven van der Heide.
On 12/12/07, Cody Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 17:43 +0100, Lieven van der Heide wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I made some fixes for the nmake
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2007 1:21 PM, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I don't really see the need for adding symbols to the library to
>> represent 0. If there is only one "flag" in each of these that matters,
>> doesn't it make more sense to just have a boolean?
>>
>
>
14 dec 2007 kl. 09.27 skrev Alexander Larsson:
Hi,
> On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 19:19 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
>
>> For example, if we plan to never use the GAsync infrastructure for
>> anything other than GIO there is a point to put it under the GIO
>> namespace as it shows where it belongs and
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 19:19 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> For example, if we plan to never use the GAsync infrastructure for
> anything other than GIO there is a point to put it under the GIO
> namespace as it shows where it belongs and what part of GLib it is
> used for. It also means w
Hi again,
Here we go with the patches for the hal volume monitoring backend:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/gio.patch
http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/nautilus.patch
http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/gvfs.patch
First there's a gio patch with some feature additions and fixes fo
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 19:45 +0100, Richard Hult wrote:
> Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> > I just wanted to clarify though that it's not so much for technical
> > reasons I suggested that we namespace a bit more carefully.
> >
> > For example, if we plan to never use the GAsync infrastructure for
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
