Re: RFC: GLib testing framework

2007-11-08 Thread Tim Janik
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: > On 07/11/2007, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> How about token concatenation[1]? i have to use that already for the current implementation, see my recent header: http://git.imendio.com/?p=timj/glib-testing.git;a=b

pango branched, a while ago...

2007-11-08 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
Hi, Ok, I forgot to send this earlier, but anyway. A few weeks ago Pango was branched for 1.18 retroactively. The stable branch is called pango-1-18. Please update. -- behdad http://behdad.org/ "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neithe

Re: RFC: GLib testing framework

2007-11-08 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
On 07/11/2007, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 07/11/2007, Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Morten Welinder wrote: > > > > >> nobody has to use this syntax. you can stick to the ever simple: > > >>g_assert (foo > bar); > > >> > > >> ho

Re: Merging gio into glib

2007-11-08 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 16:31 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 21:46 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > > > This leads me to belive it should be possible to create a configure > > option for glib such that libglib, libgmodule, libgobject are in the > > same libglib.so file, and

gtester git repo (Re: GLib testing framework)

2007-11-08 Thread Tim Janik
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Tim Janik wrote: > i've checked in Sven's and my code into a git-svn mirror of glib on > testbit.eu. so you can browse the recent changes here: > http://testbit.eu/gitdata?p=glib.git;a=shortlog;h=gtester > > e.g. todays latest version of the testing examples is here: > http:/

Re: branching GLib-2.15 and Gtk+-2.13

2007-11-08 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le mardi 02 octobre 2007 à 21:44 +0200, Mathias Hasselmann a écrit : > Am Dienstag, den 02.10.2007, 20:13 +0200 schrieb Tim Janik: > > there have been some pings recently on API changing bugs in > > bugzilla, and i've heared about other API related bugs coming > > up soon. so i guess next week wou