Hej,
wouldn't it make sense to move setting the bug-tracker url to spme
normal g_lib module, like where g_(g|s)et_application_name() is. he
g_option stuff could display the link when running --help.
We would need two urls: one template to get a report by id and one to
file a bug.
Stefan
Q
GLib 2.14.3 is now available for download at:
ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/glib/2.14/
http://download.gnome.org/sources/glib/2.14/
glib-2.14.3.tar.bz2 md5sum: d6e695a2dc96dcdd9d120d8efe265862
glib-2.14.3.tar.gzmd5sum: 979c2ee98b7527d2ba8270ca368f9063
This is a bug fix release in the 2.14 series
On Nov 6, 2007, at 2:40 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Nov 6, 2007 2:19 PM, Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> however if you want the value of 'foo' and 'bar' be printed out,
>> instead
>> of just the value of (foo > bar) which would be 0 or 1, then there
>> are
>> no other means than
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 09:14:31PM +0100, Tim Janik wrote:
> void g_test_bugzilla (const gchar *bugzilla_url_prefix);
> void g_test_bug (guintbugid);
>
> g_test_bugzilla() if called outside a testcase will set the default
> bugzilla url for all test cases. if called inside a test c
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Nov 6, 2007 2:19 PM, Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/1/07, Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> One thing I find pretty useful, that has not been mentioned so far (or
>>> I missed
On Nov 6, 2007 2:19 PM, Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
> > On 11/1/07, Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > One thing I find pretty useful, that has not been mentioned so far (or
> > I missed it) is regression tests for bugs. For these it i
Hi Matthias,
Matthias Clasen schrieb:
> On 11/1/07, Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't have much in terms of comments. My general reaction to
> grandiose test frameworks is that fixtures, setup/teardown,
> hierarchical test suites are too much overhead for me. Maybe this
> approach
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On 11/1/07, Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One thing I find pretty useful, that has not been mentioned so far (or
> I missed it) is regression tests for bugs. For these it is very useful
> to have some standardized way to refer to the bug they
On 11/1/07, Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't have much in terms of comments. My general reaction to
grandiose test frameworks is that fixtures, setup/teardown,
hierarchical test suites are too much overhead for me. Maybe this
approach to testing works for people who are move
discipline
