Re: let g_warn_if_fail replace g_assert

2007-10-17 Thread Brian J. Tarricone
Marco Barisione wrote: > Il giorno mer, 17/10/2007 alle 11.56 +0200, Tim Janik ha scritto: >> - add g_warn_if_fail (condition); which produces a critical >>warning about failing assertions but contrary to g_assert >>returns. > > If it's called g_warn_if_fail() I would expect a g_warning()

Re: let g_warn_if_fail replace g_assert

2007-10-17 Thread Marco Barisione
Il giorno mer, 17/10/2007 alle 11.56 +0200, Tim Janik ha scritto: > - add g_warn_if_fail (condition); which produces a critical >warning about failing assertions but contrary to g_assert >returns. If it's called g_warn_if_fail() I would expect a g_warning() not a g_critical(). -- Marco B

GTK+ 2.12.1 released

2007-10-17 Thread Matthias Clasen
GTK+ 2.12.1 is now available for download at: ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/2.12/ http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gtk+/2.12/ gtk+-2.12.1.tar.bz2 md5sum: c46f34addc2fe3ea6756055d59fb8856 gtk+-2.12.1.tar.gzmd5sum: b0cd0b8067d3a83b05764480f73f9306 This is a bugfix release in the 2.12 se

let g_warn_if_fail replace g_assert

2007-10-17 Thread Tim Janik
hey All. proposing to turn g_asert into a warning: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2007-October/msg00053.html was obviously not perceived too well. as i read it, most people are not against my basic reasoning, but are clearly in favour of adding g_warn_if_fail or a similar varian