Re: Gtk application(hello.c) over GTK-DirectFB

2006-08-23 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 13:01 +0530, Prasanna Kumar K wrote: > >>Hi All, >> >>I'm not getting the top level window when trying to run some >>GTK-applications over GTK-DirectFB.. >>I'm getting the internal contents of the GTK-application, like >>buttons, bars etc... but not t

Re: Reverting to non-async file chooser

2006-08-23 Thread Tim Janik
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: > On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 11:55 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: > >> the reason we didn't have these semantics in the first place is that >> because the file operations may be executed *asyncronously*, cancellation >> can fail. > > Yes, cancellation can fai

Re: about gtk/_gtk_kegtkkeyhash.c:y_hash_lookup() and fuzzy matches

2006-08-23 Thread didier .
> OK, say that we have a key that produces ~ in layout 1 and / in layout > 2. You think it's confusing that: > > - If the app has a keybinding for both Control-~ and Control-/ >then the key does different things in layout 1 and layout 2. No, when using the same layout. saying Control-~ is qui

Re: Reverting to non-async file chooser

2006-08-23 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 11:55 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: > the reason we didn't have these semantics in the first place is that > because the file operations may be executed *asyncronously*, cancellation > can fail. Yes, cancellation can fail, but it turns out that you normally don't care about that.

Re: about gtk/_gtk_kegtkkeyhash.c:y_hash_lookup() and fuzzy matches

2006-08-23 Thread Owen Taylor
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 17:42 +0200, didier . wrote: > On 8/17/06, Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't think there would be anything particularly puzzling - if people > > are used to the layout independence for letters, they wouldn't be that > > surprised that it happened for punctu

Re: about gtk/_gtk_kegtkkeyhash.c:y_hash_lookup() and fuzzy matches

2006-08-23 Thread didier .
On 8/17/06, Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think there would be anything particularly puzzling - if people > are used to the layout independence for letters, they wouldn't be that > surprised that it happened for punctuation as well. Yes but if an application have a binding for b

Re: Clarification about surfaces in Gtk 2.6 and 2.10

2006-08-23 Thread Tim Janik
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Raju S N wrote: > Hi all, > > I am familiar with Gtk2.6 version code. We have plans to migrate to 2.10. > In 2.6, it was not mandatory to use cairo. Now I see that Cairo is an > integral part of 2.10. > Can I know how the approach is changed from 2.6 to 2.10 in the case of > h

Clarification about surfaces in Gtk 2.6 and 2.10

2006-08-23 Thread Raju S N
Hi all, I am familiar with Gtk2.6 version code. We have plans to migrate to 2.10. In 2.6, it was not mandatory to use cairo. Now I see that Cairo is an integral part of 2.10. Can I know how the approach is changed from 2.6 to 2.10 in the case of handling surfaces ? And how the migration happened

Font used by GTK application on DirectFB

2006-08-23 Thread Jalagandeswari G
Hi, What is the default font that is used by the gtk application on DirectFB? Because i am getting font related error while building mozilla over DirectFB. Regards, Jala ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/ma

Re: GSlice with tight memory (Re: Help Needed)

2006-08-23 Thread Tim Janik
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Kaustubh Atrawalkar wrote: > Soeren Sandmann wrote: >> Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> whether you benefit in terms of memory size by using GSlice instead of >>> malloc/free depends heavily on your application. simply watch your >>> memory requirements with G_SLICE=