> Hi,
>
> I saw that the name GtkTransparent is not good.
> I should select a better name like GtkCustomShape or some
> other name. Sorry.
And unless this is a patch for GTK+, you shouldn't use the Gtk prefix.
That namespace belongs to GTK+.
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
www.o
Hi,
I saw that the name GtkTransparent is not good.
I should select a better name like GtkCustomShape or some
other name. Sorry.
Regards,
--
kou
2006/7/13, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Qua, 2006-07-12 at 23:47 +0900, Kouhei Sutou wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hello Jala,
> I was trying to build "GtkWebCore" in Fedora Core3.
> I downloaded "osb-jscore-0.5.0.tar.gz" from,
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=121646&package_id=1327
> 25.
Didn't you think the gtk-webcore mailing list might be more appropriate? As
this does not have anyt
On Qua, 2006-07-12 at 23:47 +0900, Kouhei Sutou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Re: GtkTransparent" on Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:59:24 +0100,
> "Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can you stack GtkTransparent widgets?
>
> Yes.
>
> > If so, does it have the ex
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> This has been discussed a bit at Guadec; and I have started looking into
> what it would take to allow compiling GTK+ with certain subsets of
> widgets.
>
> My current patch defines a small number of optional subsets:
>
> * broken: widgets covered by GTK_ENABLE_BROKEN
>
On 7/11/06, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jonathon Jongsma wrote:> > On 7/5/06, Murray Cumming
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> People usually create menus with UIManager, so we need a way to specify
> >> that one of the sub-menus will be created by the recent-files system.
> >
> > I l
Hi,
I was trying to build "GtkWebCore" in Fedora Core3.
I downloaded "osb-jscore-0.5.0.tar.gz" from,
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=121646&package_id=1327
25.
when building this, i got an error. I have added the error msg here.
-><--
Hi,
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Re: GtkTransparent" on Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:59:24 +0100,
"Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you stack GtkTransparent widgets?
Yes.
> If so, does it have the expected result with translucency?
Yes. See this screenshot:
http://pub.cozm
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 10:47 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
> [...]
> >>
> >>I meant, for instance, deprecated functions in non-deprecated files.
> >
> >
> > No, it doesn't touch those. It is really meant to be widget subsets.
> >
>
> On a hypothetical level... could t
> On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 08:59 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
>> > This has been discussed a bit at Guadec; and I have started looking
>> into
>> > what it would take to allow compiling GTK+ with certain subsets of
>> > widgets.
>> >
>> > My current patch defines a small number of optional subsets:
>
Hi,
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Re: GtkTransparent" on Wed, 12 Jul 2006 11:34:45 +0900 (JST),
Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wrote a widget GtkTransparent that makes your custom shape
> > widget easily. If you want to get an arc shape widget, you
> > can write the following:
>
Matthias Clasen wrote:
[...]
>>
>>I meant, for instance, deprecated functions in non-deprecated files.
>
>
> No, it doesn't touch those. It is really meant to be widget subsets.
>
On a hypothetical level... could this all be simplified by attacking it
from a makefile level ?
One could use gcc
On Ter, 2006-07-11 at 22:34 +0900, Kouhei Sutou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote a widget GtkTransparent that makes your custom shape
> widget easily. If you want to get an arc shape widget, you
> can write the following:
>
> static gboolean
> expose_cb (GtkWidget *widget, GdkEventExpose *event, gpointer
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 08:59 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > This has been discussed a bit at Guadec; and I have started looking into
> > what it would take to allow compiling GTK+ with certain subsets of
> > widgets.
> >
> > My current patch defines a small number of optional subsets:
> >
> > * br
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 14:28 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 08:59 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> >> > This has been discussed a bit at Guadec; and I have started looking
> >> into
> >> > what it would take to allow compiling GTK+ with certain subsets of
> >> > widgets.
> >> >
--- Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 00:06 -0400, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> >
> > --- Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > * Installing this version will overwrite your existing
> > >copy of Pango-1.12.
> >
> > Shameless plug
> I wrote a widget GtkTransparent that makes your custom shape
> widget easily. If you want to get an arc shape widget, you
> can write the following:
Interesting. Are there screenshots for GtkTransparent?
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@g
> This has been discussed a bit at Guadec; and I have started looking into
> what it would take to allow compiling GTK+ with certain subsets of
> widgets.
>
> My current patch defines a small number of optional subsets:
>
> * broken: widgets covered by GTK_ENABLE_BROKEN
> * deprecated: widgets cov
Many thanks. This is really useful to know.
> Hi all;
>
> Unfortunately, when importing the GtkRecent API in GTK+ I made a mistake
> and these two functions have been erroneously left inside the
> GtkRecentChooser interface API:
>
> gtk_recent_chooser_set_show_numbers()
> gtk_recent_chooser_ge
19 matches
Mail list logo
