Hi,
I have resolved this problem after add gdk_threads_*() to all timer
callback functions as following :
gdk_threads_enter();
.
.
gdk_threads_leave();
Regards
Rill
//--
gdk_threads_enter();
g
I've already narrowed this a little further - its in gtktreeview.c (3801)
/* draw the big row-spanning focus rectangle, if needed */
if (!has_special_cell && node == cursor &&
GTK_TREE_VIEW_FLAG_SET (tree_view, GTK_TREE_VIEW_DRAW_KEYFOCUS) &&
GTK_WIDGET_HAS_FOCUS (widget))
hi,
I am looking at the treeview source to find out how the cell-cursor
focus is handled.
In a treeview I have selection mode is none. Cells are not editable.
When I focus the treeview and then press cursor up/down, the current
line gets a thin rectangle draw around.
IMHO this is not correct, o
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Martyn Russell writes:
> Would it be plausible to have support for the 16-bit limit under Win9x
> and support for everything else to work outside the 16-bit limit too?
Well, as you might imagine, this would mean rather ugly
code... Anyway, the current code
Hi Owen,
I've submitted two little patches under
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167614
I've not added a reference for the long desc, as in the case of the
param specs this would mean lots of them.
Furthermore I have not written something about signal names, as in the
code there is a FI
Martyn Russell writes:
> Would it be plausible to have support for the 16-bit limit under Win9x
> and support for everything else to work outside the 16-bit limit too?
Well, as you might imagine, this would mean rather ugly
code... Anyway, the current code that tries to take the 16-bit limit
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 23:41, Owen Taylor wrote:
> I think what we basically need to do is:
>
> - Dig up the license text, put it *in* the docs obviously
This is what was on the web pages (the old gtk-web/rdp/index.html):
What will be the license of the documentation?
Although the final de
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 03:07 +, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > > This is a "forgetting Win9x would make things much easier"
> > > situation...
>
> > But actually I'm seeing this meltdown of the treeview on a current
> > XP ("Professional") system.
>
> Yes, you misunderstood me. The current co