Liam R E Quin wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-15-01 at 16:02 -0500, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
>
>> If I patch the code to use 64k stack size for new threads, like this:
> [...]
>> memory consumption drops dramatically (and the program still works):
>
> does it still work with larger images? E.g. mak
On Mon, 2007-15-01 at 16:02 -0500, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
> If I patch the code to use 64k stack size for new threads, like this:
[...]
> memory consumption drops dramatically (and the program still works):
does it still work with larger images? E.g. make one in gimp
that's 5,000 pixels
Hi all,
I'm trying to figure out why gthumb uses so much memory, even when it is
displaying an empty folder. I've figured out that it is launching 6-8
threads, which each consume 10 MB each of "writeable/private" memory.
pmap -d shows:
mapped: 141352Kwriteable/private: 76352Kshared: 51
