Le 30 novembre 2017, à 12:44, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
To be fair, there's literally no reason whatsoever to do a static
build; this is not 1983. You're going to waste more resources (loading
time, storage space) doing a static build of everything, these days.
I think there are some good reas
Le 29 novembre 2017, à 18:57, Мариано Гаудикс a écrit :
Hi . I need a example for compiling a static library with Gtk3 libraries
together .
MXE might help you with this: http://mxe.cc/
--
Lucas Levrel
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-deve
While we don't actively disable static builds, we're also not really
using them, or testing them. This typically means that doing static
builds of GTK (and its dependencies) is discouraged, or at least that
you're basically on your own.
To be fair, there's literally no reason whatsoever to do a st
Hi:
El 30/11/17 a las 13:11, bas...@starynkevitch.net escribió:
Beware that releasing such a static library in binary form (without
its source code) is probably a violation of the LGPL license.
Read carefully the LGPL2.1 license of GTK.
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.en.ht
On 2017-11-30 13:00, gtk-app-devel-list-requ...@gnome.org wrote:
Today's Topics:
1. Static library with Gtk 3 (??? ???)
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:57:31 -0300
From: ??? ???
To: gtk
Hi . I need a example for compiling a static library with Gtk3 libraries
together .
Cordial greetings
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
