On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> 1) My script will have a one-command action which will, after
> confirmation, download eighteen separate DLLs from my web site.
With a little more dependency-chasing that's become twenty DLLs, but
the concept is materially unchanged. So I n
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Lucas Levrel wrote:
> Le 5 mars 2014, Chris Angelico a écrit :
>
>
>> The sources to all of GTK? I don't know, I haven't looked; but since
>> I'm not actually compiling GTK myself, I'd need to figure out exactly
>> what sources are actually necessary.
>
>
> E. g. GT
Le 5 mars 2014, Chris Angelico a écrit :
The sources to all of GTK? I don't know, I haven't looked; but since
I'm not actually compiling GTK myself, I'd need to figure out exactly
what sources are actually necessary.
E. g. GTK+ 2.24 is only 13 MB (compressed), here:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gn
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Lucas Levrel wrote:
> En date de : Mer 5.3.14, Chris Angelico a écrit :
>
>> The very easiest solution for my users would be for me to
>> distribute a .ZIP file of eighteen DLLs, which my app can fetch and
>> deploy. But that would require me to make the source of
En date de : Mer 5.3.14, Chris Angelico a écrit :
> The very easiest solution for my users would be for me to
> distribute a .ZIP file of eighteen DLLs, which my app can fetch and
> deploy. But that would require me to make the source of those DLLs
> available, and AFAICT pointing to gtk.org doe
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Tristan Van Berkom
wrote:
> Since these particular LGPL sources are already made available by
> other parties (i.e. GTK+ & friends by GNOME etc) - I believe
> that you do not need to host these files directly - but must somehow
> at least link to these sources when
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 17:13 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Daniel Kasak wrote:
> > If you're in doubt, I think the best way to do this is to distribute things
> > separately. Just make an installer / updater for the GTK libs ( that would
> > be handy, by the way ..
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Daniel Kasak wrote:
> If you're in doubt, I think the best way to do this is to distribute things
> separately. Just make an installer / updater for the GTK libs ( that would
> be handy, by the way ... oh and if you build some Windows themes, *please*
> distribute
Standard disclaimer: I am not a lawyer.
If you're in doubt, I think the best way to do this is to distribute things
separately. Just make an installer / updater for the GTK libs ( that would
be handy, by the way ... oh and if you build some Windows themes, *please*
distribute these too ). Then in
I have a Pike GTK app that works on Windows and Linux (and
theoretically other platforms but I haven't tested it). The Windows
version of Pike distributes GTK DLLs for 2.12.11, which has some flaws
compared to 2.24.10 which I use elsewhere. So it would be convenient
for my users if I could have a s
10 matches
Mail list logo
