On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:56 PM, dhk wrote:
[...]
>>> I have a callback that is called when a MenuItem is selected, but in the
>>> callback the paramenter is which is suppose to be the MenuItem is NULL.
>>> The callback signature is "void user_function (GtkMenuItem *menuitem,
>>> gpointer user_dat
Carlos Pereira wrote:
> I am fairly experienced with sensitive/insensitive states in Menuitems
> in old Option Menus and new Combo Boxes, but I am not sure in which
> context your Menuitem appears...
>
> Could you explain what is the parent of your MenuItems? perhaps with a
> very small bit of cod
I am fairly experienced with sensitive/insensitive states in Menuitems
in old Option Menus and new Combo Boxes, but I am not sure in which
context your Menuitem appears...
Could you explain what is the parent of your MenuItems? perhaps with a
very small bit of code showing how they are created
> You have to find you what dv is, where is is constructed and
> how to pass it where you set up the notify handler.
DirView *
dirview_create (const gchar *root_dir,
GtkWidget *parent_win,
GimvThumbWin *tw)
{
(...)
dnotify is being slowly overtaken by inotify but
> If you know what action you want to invoke, you can also
> call the callback function of the item directly (or some
> other function that performs the requested action), can't
> you?
I guess it'll be shorter to start from the beginning. I'm messing around with
GimageView 0.2.27. I want it to a
On Wed, 23 May 2007 16:49:50 +0200, David Neèas (Yeti) wrote
> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 10:36:13AM -0400, danielg RHCE wrote:
> > > Why don't you just call the callback function which is connected to the
> > > signal?
> > > Or use g_signal_emit() or g_signal_emit_by_name() to "emulate" a
> > > clic
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 03:00:03PM -0400, danielg Posting wrote:
>
> > It could look like:
> >
> > dv = ... set up the dir view ...
> > /* And here comes your part */
> > setup_notify(dv, &refresh_me);
>
> Okay, I understand the setup_notify and the dv there, what's the refresh_me
> for (d
> You have to find you what dv is, where is is constructed and
> how to pass it where you set up the notify handler.
DirView *
dirview_create (const gchar *root_dir,
GtkWidget *parent_win,
GimvThumbWin *tw)
{
(...)
dnotify is being slowly overtaken by inotify but
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 12:38:58PM -0400, danielg Posting wrote:
>
> I guess it'll be shorter to start from the beginning. I'm messing around with
> GimageView 0.2.27.
Last release 2.5 years ago? No CVS commit in 2 years?
Sounds like a dead project to me. I suggest not to waste
your efforts an
> If you know what action you want to invoke, you can also
> call the callback function of the item directly (or some
> other function that performs the requested action), can't
> you?
I guess it'll be shorter to start from the beginning. I'm messing around with
GimageView 0.2.27. I want it to a
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 11:21:41AM -0400, danielg Posting wrote:
>
> and I'm trying to activate the refresh menu item. How would it know which
> menuitem to activate?
Leaving aside item factories have been deprecated for a long
time:
(a) you can store the item somewhere (e.g. in some struct)
(b)
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 11:25:37AM -0400, danielg Posting wrote:
> I'm just trying everything.
>
> Compiler complains if I don't put quotes around it (undeclared (first use of
> this function)) , compiler doesn't complain when I do, but it segfaults.
>
> As I said, I've been out of this game
On Wed, 23 May 2007 17:13:56 +0200, Jonathan Winterflood wrote
> Not really GTK-related, but shouldn't the compiler have complained loudly
> about passing a char* instead of a GtkMenuItem* ?
> Or are you using a binding of gtk to a language that doesn't check
> types at compile-time?
I'm just try
> http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/GtkMenuItem.html#gtk-menu-
> item-activate
>
> It has argument of GtkMenuItem* type, i.e. you pass the menu
> item object. No path, name, or anything. The item itself
> (that's menuitem here).
>
I'm with you on everything you said and I feel like a
Not really GTK-related, but shouldn't the compiler have complained loudly
about passing a char* instead of a GtkMenuItem* ?
Or are you using a binding of gtk to a language that doesn't check types at
compile-time?
Jonathan
On 5/23/07, David Nečas (Yeti) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 11:02:54AM -0400, danielg Posting wrote:
> >
> > gtk_widget_activate(item); or gtk_menu_item_activate(item);
>
> Okay, So, with this as the originator:
> ifactory = gtk_item_factory_from_widget (dirview_popup);
> (...)
> menuitem = gtk_item_factory_get_item (ifactory, "/
On Wed, 23 May 2007 16:49:50 +0200, David Neèas (Yeti) wrote
> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 10:36:13AM -0400, danielg RHCE wrote:
> > > Why don't you just call the callback function which is connected to the
> > > signal?
> > > Or use g_signal_emit() or g_signal_emit_by_name() to "emulate" a
> > > clic
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 10:36:13AM -0400, danielg RHCE wrote:
> > Why don't you just call the callback function which is connected to the
> > signal?
> > Or use g_signal_emit() or g_signal_emit_by_name() to "emulate" a
> > click on the menu item.
>
> That's exactly what I'm trying to do, simulate
On Wed, 23 May 2007 16:18:41 +0200, Enrico Tröger wrote
> On Wed, 23 May 2007 10:12:31 -0400, "danielg RHCE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Legacy code I'm trying to update and I've been out of the programming
> > thing for a while.
> >
> > I have a popup menu with this item in it:
> >
On Wed, 23 May 2007 10:12:31 -0400, "danielg RHCE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Legacy code I'm trying to update and I've been out of the programming
> thing for a while.
>
> I have a popup menu with this item in it:
> menuitem = gtk_item_factory_get_item (ifactory, "/Refresh
> Tree"); gtk_
20 matches
Mail list logo
