MEA-MikeFriedrichs writes:
> One statement confuses me, as follows, "Unlike GTK+ 1.2 on Unix, GTK+ 1.3.0
> on Windows it is built to use GLib 2.x. (There is no binary distribution of
> any GLib 1.2 for Windows.)"
>
> Since I'm using win2k, this statement implies I use Glib2.x. Does this
At 02:12 PM 7/30/2005, you wrote:
Am Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:52:35 -0500 schrieb MEA-MikeFriedrichs:
> List,
>
> I am using Soft Integrations 'Ch', which is bound with GTK+ 1.3. Ch
> is an 'C' interpreter, which is nice because it complies with ANSI 99
> syntax, makes it easy for debugging and ru
Am Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:52:35 -0500 schrieb MEA-MikeFriedrichs:
> List,
>
> I am using Soft Integrations 'Ch', which is bound with GTK+ 1.3. Ch
> is an 'C' interpreter, which is nice because it complies with ANSI 99
> syntax, makes it easy for debugging and running programs in the
> office. Wh
