On Thursday 06 March 2008 14:55:13 Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> GdkGLContext *
> gdk_gl_create_context (GdkDrawable *drawable,
> guint *gl_attributes);
>
> and, if the cached GdkGLContext gl_attributes are different than the
> passed ones (with NULL meaning "use the d
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 20:08 +, Jon Harrop wrote:
> > > If anyone is interested in improving the situation for scientists and
> > > engineers then I would recommend taking this into account: keep it simple
> > > to bind.
> >
> > you can't really get much simpler than a:
> >
> > GLXContext gl
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 13:03:04 Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 19:37 +, Jon Harrop wrote:
> > I'm not sure who you are referring to as "we" but many people need little
> > beyond GlArea. I have no desire to create Gtk-compatible widgets. I only
> > want to render general gra
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 09:35:46 Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 19:37 +, Jon Harrop wrote:
> > > No, gtkglarea is dead.
> >
> > GlArea still has many users and is the defacto standard for some
> > languages.
>
> it may have many users, but it's unmaintained, so it is ipso fac
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 18:37:22 Carlos Pereira wrote:
> I just ported my app (more than 200,000 lines, totally independent and
> unlimited number of OpenGL areas, sharing pre-compiled OpenGL lists,
> etc.) last night from Gtkglarea to Gtkglext, so I am in a good position
> to highlight the diff
Jon Harrop wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 March 2008 18:14:39 Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 17:04 +, Carlos Pereira wrote:
>>
>>> 2) change the name, for example to Gtkglarea 2.0*, the legitimate
>>> sucessor to Gtkglarea 1 (the last version of Gtkglarea that I downloaded
>>
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 19:37 +, Jon Harrop wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 March 2008 18:14:39 Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 17:04 +, Carlos Pereira wrote:
> > > 2) change the name, for example to Gtkglarea 2.0*, the legitimate
> > > sucessor to Gtkglarea 1 (the last version of Gtk
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 19:37 +, Jon Harrop wrote:
> > > 2) change the name, for example to Gtkglarea 2.0*, the legitimate
> > > sucessor to Gtkglarea 1 (the last version of Gtkglarea that I downloaded
> > > last week is 1.99 and still comes with gtk_signal_connect and other Gtk
> > > 1.2* func
On Tuesday 04 March 2008 18:14:39 Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 17:04 +, Carlos Pereira wrote:
> > 2) change the name, for example to Gtkglarea 2.0*, the legitimate
> > sucessor to Gtkglarea 1 (the last version of Gtkglarea that I downloaded
> > last week is 1.99 and still come
4 mar 2008 kl. 19.14 skrev Behdad Esfahbod:
Hi,
> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 17:04 +, Carlos Pereira wrote:
>
>> I have red a few times that thread, that Owen started five years ago,
>> and apparently there is agreement in the essentials:
>>
>> 1) remove all the fat from Gtkglext, namely the wrapp
Hi carlos:
>
> I believe this would make Gtk more appealing, particularly for
> scientific/engineering/architecture applications.
> Carlos
>
>
>>
I think so...
http://groups.google.es/group/opengeomap/web/ogm-platform
hehe
Regards.
___
gtk-app-deve
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 17:04 +, Carlos Pereira wrote:
> Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> > 3 mar 2008 kl. 22.48 skrev Carlos Pereira:
> >
> > Hi Carlos,
> >
> > GtkGLext seems to be the most popular GL Area to use these days. You
> > might also want to look at Clutter [1] or Pigment [2] which are
>
Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> 3 mar 2008 kl. 22.48 skrev Carlos Pereira:
>
> Hi Carlos,
>
> GtkGLext seems to be the most popular GL Area to use these days. You
> might also want to look at Clutter [1] or Pigment [2] which are
> canvases offering some higher level abstractions for 2D/3D usages. It
>
3 mar 2008 kl. 22.48 skrev Carlos Pereira:
Hi Carlos,
GtkGLext seems to be the most popular GL Area to use these days. You
might also want to look at Clutter [1] or Pigment [2] which are
canvases offering some higher level abstractions for 2D/3D usages. It
depends a bit on what you need, if
14 matches
Mail list logo
