On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 22:06 +0100, Chris Vine wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 08:59 +0200, Jonathan Winterflood wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could the GAsyncQueue be configured to run a callback in the main
> > thread when a element (or whatever gets pushed into it) is ready, just
> > like one woud do wi
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 08:59 +0200, Jonathan Winterflood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could the GAsyncQueue be configured to run a callback in the main
> thread when a element (or whatever gets pushed into it) is ready, just
> like one woud do with a GIOChannel ?
>
> It would be cleaner than a timeout or an i
I'm new to gtk and still reading tutorials, but can we
register a new signal to any global object (possiblely
main window), thus call back function can be connected
in the main thread and the signal can be emitted in
other threads?
--- Jonathan Winterflood
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/11/07,
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> Make your threads add stuff to a single GAsyncQueue. Let an idle
> function (or a timeout function) always run, that checks the GAsyncQueue
> and does something if there is something to do, or simply returns if it
> is empty. Wouldn't that work?
>
Yes, but that w
On 7/11/07, Gabriele Greco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jonathan Winterflood wrote:
> > Could the GAsyncQueue be configured to run a callback in the main thread
> > when a element (or whatever gets pushed into it) is ready, just like one
> > woud do with a GIOChannel ?
> >
> > It would be cleaner
Hi,
Could the GAsyncQueue be configured to run a callback in the main thread
when a element (or whatever gets pushed into it) is ready, just like one
woud do with a GIOChannel ?
It would be cleaner than a timeout or an idle function I think.
Jonathan
On 7/10/07, Chris Vine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 13:10 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
[snip]
> Make your threads add stuff to a single GAsyncQueue. Let an idle
> function (or a timeout function) always run, that checks the GAsyncQueue
> and does something if there is something to do, or simply returns if it
> is empty
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 17:44 +0200, Gabriele Greco wrote:
> I've a few threads (more than one) doing some work (not accessing GTK
> functions), I'd like to have a general way to make them notify their
> work to the main loop.
>
> I used the g_idle_add() in the previous context where I had only a
Gabriele Greco escreveu:
> I've a few threads (more than one) doing some work (not accessing GTK
> functions), I'd like to have a general way to make them notify their
> work to the main loop.
>
> I used the g_idle_add() in the previous context where I had only a
> thread with this behaviour, bu
