On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 06:53:18PM +0400, Vlasov Vitaly wrote:
> GtkTreeIter *default_iter --> GtkTreeIter default_iter;
>
> It's question about:
> default_iter = *iter; <-- is that normal?
Yes. It is explicitly specified that tree iters can be copied by value.
See for instance here
http://
Oops!
GtkTreeIter *default_iter --> GtkTreeIter default_iter;
It's question about:
default_iter = *iter; <-- is that normal?
I can give you more verbose example(it's pseudo-code, not C):
prepare_iter()
{
GtkTreeIter iter;
gtk_tree_store_insert_after( ... , &iter , ...);
add_new_entry(model
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 05:05:37PM +0400, Vlasov Vitaly wrote:
> Is that normal, to assign one GtkTreeIter to another?
>
> For example:
> void add_new( ... , GtkTreeIter *iter)
> {
> GtkTreeIter *default_iter;
>
> if(iter != NULL)
> {
>default_iter = iter; <-- is that noraml??
