On 2011-12-06, at 8:12 PM, Andrew Cowie wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 17:47 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
>
>> gtk_widget_set_size_request() should still succeed with the expected
>> behaviour
>> of setting the minimum size of a widget,
>
> So, does it do so for GtkLabel? ie, is it accepta
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 17:47 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> gtk_widget_set_size_request() should still succeed with the expected behaviour
> of setting the minimum size of a widget,
So, does it do so for GtkLabel? ie, is it acceptable to call it?
[this thread has become a bit confusing]
AfC
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:15 AM, John Lindgren wrote:
> Hi Tristan,
>
> This makes a bit more sense now.
>
>
> On 12/05/2011 09:27 AM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:18 PM, John Lindgren
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It looks to me as though there are 3 separate problems contributin
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Costin Chirvasuta wrote:
> I don't really understand what max-width-chars would be useful for.
The max-width-chars property is intended to limit the overall size request
of a label.
if max-width-chars is set, the label will not by default request a natural
width o
I don't really understand what max-width-chars would be useful for.
Can't you set a "natural" size for a widget instead of a "natural" max
char width? If I want to ellipsize it won't do me any good if
"..." is the same as "...".
I can see there is gtk_set_size_request for setting minimum w
Hi Tristan,
This makes a bit more sense now.
On 12/05/2011 09:27 AM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:18 PM, John Lindgren wrote:
It looks to me as though there are 3 separate problems contributing here:
1. GtkLabel does not take into account gtk_widget_set_size_request()
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:18 PM, John Lindgren wrote:
> It looks to me as though there are 3 separate problems contributing here:
>
> 1. GtkLabel does not take into account gtk_widget_set_size_request() when
> reporting its "natural" size:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662043
Not a
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:56 PM, John Lindgren wrote:
> On 12/05/2011 02:22 AM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi John,
>>>
>>> I am responsible for a large part of your pain.
>>>
>>> And I'm also surprised that this code is not
It looks to me as though there are 3 separate problems contributing here:
1. GtkLabel does not take into account gtk_widget_set_size_request()
when reporting its "natural" size:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662043
2. Nor does it take into account gtk_label_set_width_chars():
http
On 12/05/2011 02:22 AM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Hi John,
I am responsible for a large part of your pain.
And I'm also surprised that this code is not working for you.
The last time I looked at size negotiation, the toplevel window
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:21 AM, John Lindgren wrote:
>> On 12/04/2011 04:02 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
>>>
>>> the status is always the same: bugs reported will be looked at by the
>>> gtk maintainers depending on time.
>>
>>
>> So the s
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:21 AM, John Lindgren wrote:
> On 12/04/2011 04:02 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
>>
>> the status is always the same: bugs reported will be looked at by the
>> gtk maintainers depending on time.
>
>
> So the status at this moment is that no developers have time to look at bugs
On 12/04/2011 04:02 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
the status is always the same: bugs reported will be looked at by the
gtk maintainers depending on time.
So the status at this moment is that no developers have time to look at
bugs reported by application developers. Or is there something wrong
hi;
On 4 December 2011 02:56, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> I agree that yours, and a few other GTK3 bugs[1][2], have kept me from
> porting my apps from GTK2. My suggestion would be to post your e-mail to the
> gtk-devel list[3], and as a last resort open a bug on the Red Hat bugzilla
> as Red Ha
hi;
On 4 December 2011 02:41, John Lindgren wrote:
> I am wondering what the status of GTK 3 is at this time with regard to bugs
> reported by application developers.
the status is always the same: bugs reported will be looked at by the
gtk maintainers depending on time.
you may want to join t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/2011 07:41 PM, John Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering what the status of GTK 3 is at this time with regard
> to bugs reported by application developers. I reported a rather
> serious bug (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662
On 12/03/2011 08:41 PM, John Lindgren wrote:
I am wondering what the status of GTK 3 is at this time with regard to
bugs reported by application developers. I reported a rather serious
bug (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662043) a month and a
half ago, and there is still no comment
17 matches
Mail list logo
