On 05/06/2016 09:27 PM, Andrew Robinson wrote:
I'm sorry for that. One of my biggest flaws in human relations is detecting
when someone is being ironic, sarcastic, or is just joking around, and when
they are being serious.
I would think both list would be interested in knowing what is required
On 05/06/2016 07:01 PM, Lucas Levrel wrote:
> Le 5 mai 2016, Andrew Robinson a écrit :
>> 1) Because there are between 40 to 120Mb worth of libraries or their
>> dependencies I would have to post on my website.
>
> It's not clear to me whether one has to distribute GTK if it's linked
> statically,
Try this package:
$ pacman -Ss mingw-w64-i686-gtk3
mingw32/mingw-w64-i686-gtk3 3.18.6-1 [installed]
GObject-based multi-platform GUI toolkit (v3) (mingw-w64)
On 5/4/2016 3:51 PM, Andrew Robinson wrote:
> Yeah, I see that, but that only downloads 64-bit binaries. I need the Win-32
> binaries.
On 05/04/2016 03:59 PM, Andrew Robinson wrote:
> No, there are no Win32 binaries in MSYS2. Where are you getting your
> information?
>
MSYS2 contains pacman. `pacman -Syu mingw-w64-x86_64-gtk3` downloads
GTK+ binaries for x86_64 and puts them in the C:\msys64\mingw64
directory (by default). This
On 05/04/2016 02:22 AM, Andrew Robinson wrote:
> I have an idea! Why doesn't someone just compile all the binaries for Win32
> and Win64 and make them available on the Internet, that way none of us will
> have to go through all this stupid BS just to get some binaries? Just two
> packages, one for
On 05/03/2016 08:34 PM, Dov Grobgeld wrote:
> The complete gtk run time is only about 20MB in size (at least for gtk2)
> which with todays hard disk sizes really is negligable, so I agree that
> there is no reason to try to create a common gtk runtime.
>
> I still remember the frustration back in
Another equivalent scons-based way of compiling for windows with gcc is
shown in my program giv.
See: https://github.com/dov/giv/blob/master/SConstruct
SCons uses the Sconstruct files to do the cross-compilation and also calls
out to nsis to create a windows installer.
The complete gtk run time
On Tue, 3 May 2016, Dave Howorth wrote:
On 2016-05-03 16:57, Florian Pelz wrote:
I'd like to have one standard GTK+ installer for the GTK+ DLLs etc. that
can be downloaded and installed from other installers, so there is just
one GTK+ installed on Windows instead of one copy of perhaps differen
On 05/03/2016 06:12 PM, Dave Howorth wrote:
> On 2016-05-03 16:57, Florian Pelz wrote:
>> I'd like to have one standard GTK+ installer for the GTK+ DLLs etc. that
>> can be downloaded and installed from other installers, so there is just
>> one GTK+ installed on Windows instead of one copy of perha
On 2016-05-03 16:57, Florian Pelz wrote:
I'd like to have one standard GTK+ installer for the GTK+ DLLs etc. that
can be downloaded and installed from other installers, so there is just
one GTK+ installed on Windows instead of one copy of perhaps different
versions of GTK+ for each application.
On 05/03/2016 03:26 PM, Lucas Levrel wrote:
> By default MXE links statically. So you don't have any dll to bundle
> with your app. In such circumstances, what does LGPL say? Do you still
> have to provide the GTK source code (given that you don't distribute GTK
> libs)?
>
IANAL, but if the libra
On 05/03/2016 04:57 PM, Andrew Robinson wrote:
> Well I can't ship MSYS2 and MXE with my application, and I most certainly
> can't sell any application to grandma and grandpa, if it requires instructions
> on how to install MSYS2 and MXE just so you can run my application.
>
For MSYS2, you create
Le 2 mai 2016, Florian Pelz a écrit :
On 05/02/2016 12:36 PM, Lucas Levrel wrote:
Then I found MinGW Cross Env, now called MXE (http://mxe.cc/). It
compiled my project with no effort at all.
This is interesting. May I hijack this thread?
I did not know about MXE. What is their relationship w
Thank you Lucas, for submitting this post. MXE seems very interesting and I
feel compelled to do some more research into it.
On 5/2/2016 at 3:36 AM, Lucas Levrel wrote:
>(copy to OP in case he's already unsubscribed, apologies for duplication
>if he's not)
>
>Le 30 avril 2016, Andrew Robinson a
On 05/02/2016 12:36 PM, Lucas Levrel wrote:
> […]
>
> I'm not an expert programmer and when I wanted to compile for Windows
> the software I developped in Linux, I couldn't achieve a satisfactory
> result (using the -mwin32 or -mwindows flag gave either a clumsy
> additional command window, or yie
15 matches
Mail list logo
