On 06/16/13 21:35, Chris Vine wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:28:52 +0530
dE wrote:
Apart from that, in the free_ptr? Does memory get freed for anyone
else?
#include
#include
#define COLS 200
void free_ptr ( GtkListStore * );
int main ( ) {
gtk_init( NULL, NULL );
int i, j;
On 06/16/13 21:35, Chris Vine wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:28:52 +0530
dE wrote:
Apart from that, in the free_ptr? Does memory get freed for anyone
else?
#include
#include
#define COLS 200
void free_ptr ( GtkListStore * );
int main ( ) {
gtk_init( NULL, NULL );
int i, j;
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:28:52 +0530
dE wrote:
> Apart from that, in the free_ptr? Does memory get freed for anyone
> else?
>
> #include
> #include
> #define COLS 200
> void free_ptr ( GtkListStore * );
>
> int main ( ) {
> gtk_init( NULL, NULL );
> int i, j;
> char *temp;
>
On 06/16/13 00:40, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013, dE wrote:
On 06/15/13 14:24, dE wrote:
Yes, I realized that over time, but there appears to be something
wrong with g_object_unref or in general all GTK free functions on my
system.
In this piece of code --
#include
#include
#
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013, dE wrote:
On 06/15/13 14:24, dE wrote:
On 06/15/13 03:35, Chris Vine wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 23:03:55 +0530
dE wrote:
On 06/14/13 22:09, Chris Vine wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:41:05 +0530
dE wrote:
On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 a
On 06/15/13 14:24, dE wrote:
On 06/15/13 03:35, Chris Vine wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 23:03:55 +0530
dE wrote:
On 06/14/13 22:09, Chris Vine wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:41:05 +0530
dE wrote:
On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dE wrote:
I was moni
On 06/15/13 03:35, Chris Vine wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 23:03:55 +0530
dE wrote:
On 06/14/13 22:09, Chris Vine wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:41:05 +0530
dE wrote:
On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dE wrote:
I was monitoring the memory usage before
On 06/14/13 23:14, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 2:33 AM, dE wrote:
On 06/14/13 22:09, Chris Vine wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:41:05 +0530
dE wrote:
On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dE wrote:
I was monitoring the memory usage
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 23:03:55 +0530
dE wrote:
> On 06/14/13 22:09, Chris Vine wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:41:05 +0530
> > dE wrote:
> >> On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dE wrote:
> I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execu
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 2:33 AM, dE wrote:
> On 06/14/13 22:09, Chris Vine wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:41:05 +0530
>> dE wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dE wrote:
>
> I was monitoring the memory usage before and
On 06/14/13 22:09, Chris Vine wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:41:05 +0530
dE wrote:
On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dE wrote:
I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
g_object_unref and gtk_list_store_clear, and it didnt change
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:41:05 +0530
dE wrote:
> On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dE wrote:
> >> I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
> >> g_object_unref and gtk_list_store_clear, and it didnt change the
> >> memory usage by a
On 06/14/13 21:14, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:23 AM, dE wrote:
On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dE wrote:
I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
g_object_unref and gtk_list_store_clear, and it didnt
On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dE wrote:
I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
g_object_unref and gtk_list_store_clear, and it didnt change the memory
usage by a bit.
Is this normal (am I doing it right?)?
What are you moni
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:23 AM, dE wrote:
> On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dE wrote:
>>>
>>> I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
>>> g_object_unref and gtk_list_store_clear, and it didnt change the memory
>>> usage by
On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dE wrote:
I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
g_object_unref and gtk_list_store_clear, and it didnt change the memory
usage by a bit.
Is this normal (am I doing it right?)?
What are you moni
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dE wrote:
> I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
> g_object_unref and gtk_list_store_clear, and it didnt change the memory
> usage by a bit.
>
> Is this normal (am I doing it right?)?
What are you monitoring, and how ?
It is i normal th
On 06/14/13 13:24, Andrew Potter wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:27 AM, dE wrote:
I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
g_object_unref and gtk_list_store_clear, and it didnt change the memory
usage by a bit.
Is this normal (am I doing it right?)?
e.g. --
gtk_list_s
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:27 AM, dE wrote:
> I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
> g_object_unref and gtk_list_store_clear, and it didnt change the memory
> usage by a bit.
>
> Is this normal (am I doing it right?)?
>
> e.g. --
> gtk_list_store_clear (store);
> g_objec
I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
g_object_unref and gtk_list_store_clear, and it didnt change the memory
usage by a bit.
Is this normal (am I doing it right?)?
e.g. --
gtk_list_store_clear (store);
g_object_unref( G_OBJECT (store) );
g_object_unref ( G_OBJECT ( c
20 matches
Mail list logo
