Re: [SPAM] Re: How to create a self contained GTK+ Application for Linux

2007-05-23 Thread Michael L Torrie
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 19:31 +0200, David Nečas (Yeti) wrote: > And the dot is exactly what? The current directory? Yes > Does the library know the directory it was loaded from? It should, yes. If it really does, I have no idea. > Should libraries break when symlinked? No. Why would and shou

Re: [SPAM] Re: How to create a self contained GTK+ Application for Linux

2007-05-23 Thread Yeti
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:36:09PM +0200, Gabriele Greco wrote: > Michael Ekstrand wrote: > > You might want to take a look at what the autopackage folks are doing. > > At the very least, they have a lot of documentation on what's required > > to prepare relocatable, portable binary packages. > >

Re: [SPAM] Re: How to create a self contained GTK+ Application for Linux

2007-05-23 Thread Gabriele Greco
Michael Ekstrand wrote: > You might want to take a look at what the autopackage folks are doing. > At the very least, they have a lot of documentation on what's required > to prepare relocatable, portable binary packages. > Anyway the GTK hardcoded path are not a good thing IMHO. With some care