Emmaneule,
at ardour.org, we recently switched from using Drupal forums to Discourse.
The results have been delightful. We managed to get single sign on
integration with our existing site working, which was important for us, but
probably not so much for a GTK Discourse. More notably, once you figu
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Johny Why wrote:
> Why odd?
> How do other gtk theme editors do it?
>
what other theme editors? if they exist, go read the source ...
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.o
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11 AM, johny why wrote:
> Can gtk_rc_parse_string or other functions on the page below be used
> to write to the gtkrc-2.0 file? Or only read?
>
as already explained, read only.
> http://developer.gnome.org/gtk/stable/gtk-Resource-Files.html
>
> Is there dev support
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Johny Why wrote:
> Trying to write a script in bash or another language which reads/writes
> gtkrc-2.0. Would prefer to use gtk built-in functions for the read/write.
>
GTK does not create these files. They are generally created by humans, and
edited by them. Ther
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:11 AM, Johny Why wrote:
> Are the gtk functions exposed, so my app can call them in an existing gtk
> desktop (eg. xfce)? Or is it necessary to recompile gtk?
>
> Any "getting started" tips would be much appreciated by this noob.
>
your messages so far seem quite confusi
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Jose Aliste wrote:
> After looking at the git log, you interpret correctly, but I fail to
> see why do you perceive this as being bad. So, some GDK API is marked
> as deprecated, it seems fair to me that Gtk+ maintainers ensure the
> deprecated API is not used in
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Behdad Esfahbod
wrote:
> On 08/18/10 12:50, Paul Davis wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Matthias Clasen
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't see how that follows. All that is happening in 2.22 is that
>>> some things ar
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Matthias Clasen
wrote:
> I don't see how that follows. All that is happening in 2.22 is that
> some things are getting deprecated. You can still use them. We are not
> going to take them away from you during 2.x
i wasn't really worried about the deprecations. re
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> New functionality is available in both when it makes sense to do so, and
> deprecated functionality is marked as much.
>
> You shouldn't see any difference in usage if you don't use the new
> functionality.
We distribute a version of GTK
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 11:52 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> > GTK+ 2.21.6 is now available for download at:
>>
>> is this really a correct descriptio
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> GTK+ 2.21.6 is now available for download at:
is this really a correct description of 2.21:
> Overview of Changes from GTK+ 2.21.5 to 2.21.6
> ==
>
> * Most drawing done by GTK+ itself has been
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Tony Wang wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> Why there is always one expose-event after
> the button-press-event(and button-release-event)? that means my app redraw
> itself twice for one button event, which made the app UI flickers, any clues
> for settling the problem?
handle
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 20:26 +0530, svalbard colaco wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> k.
> So the "fix" you spoke about was in your application code and not in
> your GTK-quartz backend?
its in my own modified version of libgnomecanvas, which is distributed
on OS X as part of the app bundle.
_
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 19:55 +0530, svalbard colaco wrote:
> HI all;
>
> Further debugging has shown that antialiased canvases formed using
> gnome_canvas_new_aa() appear correctly on GTK-DFB backend
> whereas canvases formed using gnome_canvas_new() fail to render on
> GTK-DirectFB ;rather they
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 16:00 +0530, svalbard colaco wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have an application running on GTK-DirectFB and its observed
> that , a part of the window,
> which is a gnome canvas item is not rendered properly rather that
> entire vbox appears black,
> But when i click on , on a cli
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 13:17 +0200, Richard Boaz wrote:
> hi,
>
> if you want fine control over the size of your entry widgets, the
> following routines may be of help:
>
> gtk_entry_set_max_length()
> gtk_entry_set_width_chars()
these are significant, but of likely equal importance is the way
On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 10:55 -0500, Matt Hoosier wrote:
> I'm a co-worker of the original poster on this thread. Part of the
> trouble with using a new dialog is that it allocates a new X11 window,
> which is not guaranteed to be alpha blended with the parent window.
> Platforms with a compositing X
17 matches
Mail list logo
