Around about 28/10/10 13:42, z...@excite.it typed ...
Take a look at http://www.codeblocks.org/.
Not seen that one before, thanks!
--
[n...@fnx ~]# rm -f .signature
[n...@fnx ~]# ls -l .signature
ls: .signature: No such file or directory
[n...@fnx ~]# exit
___
Around about 28/10/10 12:48, John Emmas typed ...
If I'm honest Neil, GTK2 does take a lot of getting used to if
you've come from an MFC background - but once you've gotten your head
around GTK, it really works very well indeed.
I guess it would; I've used GTK far more, on and off since GTK
Around about 28/10/10 09:35, Tor Lillqvist typed ...
GTK+ 2 is to some extent usable on Windows, sure. Unfortunately, for
some aspects, earlier versions (up to 2.16 or so) are better than the
later ones up to the current stable version (2.22).
So what are the curent issues with the Win32 GTK+
Around about 30/11/07 11:13, Tor Lillqvist typed ...
> ... not MSVC's, which you apparently use as you
> talk about "release mode" and "debug mode").
OT: I can see where the assumption comes from, but as it happens we do
debug and release builds using gcc (arg, to Makefile), it's not just a
Around about 25/11/07 12:31, Benoît Dejean typed ...
> I've switched gnome-system-monitor to C++ and i'm very happy with it.
Just out of interest, did you choose GTKmm or C++ with vanilla GTK+?
I'm looking at doing some GTK from C++ (I've previously only really used
GTK+ from C), and on th
First off, I apologise if, this being a GNOME API and not strictly GTK
API question, it doesn't belong here, but I couldn't see an equivalent
mailing list, and the GNOME list I'm on & tried is more for users than
programmers.
I have an issue with panel_applet_get_size(); it lies! It r
