Re: Gtk 3.0 Build

Hi Allin, Yes, Yes. I just read through this subject, or gleaned it. Is there an code example of theme - ing in gtk3.0 anywhere in internet land? Craig Bakalian On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 17:05 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote: > On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Craig Bakalian wrote: > > > Also,

Gtk 3.0 Build

function, so it has to be something in GtkBuilder and Menu Items or ? So, anyone know what is going on here? Also, I am running Ubuntu 11.04. When the window loads it is a generic theme- It doesn't match my appearance theme choice. Anyone know what is up with that? -- Craig Bak

meny_proxy_module_load

-ass about this, but who on earth left out a menu module of a gtk release? -- Craig Bakalian ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list

GtkBuilder

o use gtk_builder_connect_signals_full? That is even more hard work! Is anybody out there having difficulty making the transition to gtk3 on ubuntu 11.04 like I am having? -- Craig Bakalian ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org

Failed to load module on run

Hi, I have been working hard to convert to 3! I am getting this when I try to run my gtk+3.0 builds-> Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module" Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "gnomesegvhandler" Any help is appreciate

I Miss Using My Anjuta IDE

here is no gtksourceview object at all. I guess the general question is, why are there so many conflicts with in the development layer of gnome and ubuntu 11.04. Is it Unity? Or is this a question for the ubuntu team, where and who ever they are? -- Crai

Re: Updated to Ubuntu 11.04 and Can't Compile

Hi Allin, I don't think it was the grace of god in my old makefiles. It was an older version of gcc on my hard drive. Thank you for all your help. Craig Bakalian On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 21:36 -0500, Allin Cottrell wrote: > On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, Craig Bakalian wrote: > > > We

Re: Updated to Ubuntu 11.04 and Can't Compile

Well call me a frog. It worked. What the heck is going on? I gotta change all my makefiles? > > CC = gcc -g -O2 -Wall # or to taste > > CFLAGS = `pkg-config --cflags gtk+-2.0` > > LIBS = `pkg-config --libs gtk+-2.0` > > > > foo: foo.c > > $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o @$ $< $(LIBS) > > Oops, that sh

Re: Updated to Ubuntu 11.04 and Can't Compile

> > So are the libraries actually there? > > ls -al /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0* > > There should be a symlink, something like > > /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so -> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2000.1 > > (version numbers may differ). If not, you need to (re-)install > libgtk2.0-dev at least. > > Allin Cottr

Re: Updated to Ubuntu 11.04 and Can't Compile

you ask for gtk+-2.0? Use --debug. > And if they are what you expect do they define the symbols such as > gtk_main? Running pkg-config is indeed of no avail if the result is > not examined. > > Yeti > I am not sure what you mean by .pc file and if I ask for g

Updated to Ubuntu 11.04 and Can't Compile

_show' hello.c:(.text+0x5d): undefined reference to `gtk_main' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Any information would be appreciated! -- Craig Bakalian ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list

Updated to Ubuntu 11.04

ow to get them back? -- Craig Bakalian ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list

Re: g_remove

Hi David and KC, The did the trick. But it is odd behavior. #include was already in my includes. Craig Bakalian On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 02:00 +0800, KC wrote: > Try to add include > > KC > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Craig Bakalian > wrote: > > Hi, > &

Re: g_remove

Hi, I have gtk and glib as includes? Am I missing something? If there wasn't the right include, the build would fail, further, the function wouldn't remove the file. Craig Bakalian On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 12:29 +, James Morris wrote: > On 17 February 2011 12:27, Craig Ba

g_remove

Hi, I am using g_remove to remove some temporary files from the /tmp folder. It is working as expected. Yet, gcc is complaining that I am making an implicit declaration. What is up with this? Craig Bakalian ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk

Re: g_spawn_async_with_pipes

re correct, it is awkward. I just had this vision of two g_spawn_async_with_pipes() hooked together. Running echo output &echo_out directly into lilypond's input &echo_out as if they "may" share &echo_out. I will need to test/hack this. I hate hac