While we don't actively disable static builds, we're also not really
using them, or testing them. This typically means that doing static
builds of GTK (and its dependencies) is discouraged, or at least that
you're basically on your own.
To be fair, there's literally no reason whatsoever to do a st
Hi:
El 30/11/17 a las 13:11, bas...@starynkevitch.net escribió:
Beware that releasing such a static library in binary form (without
its source code) is probably a violation of the LGPL license.
Read carefully the LGPL2.1 license of GTK.
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.en.ht
On 2017-11-30 13:00, gtk-app-devel-list-requ...@gnome.org wrote:
Today's Topics:
1. Static library with Gtk 3 (??? ???)
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:57:31 -0300
From: ??? ???
To: gtk devel
S
