Thank you Allin for your wonderful and knowledgeable technical advice,
everything is working now as it should. You are the best. Just ask me anytime
to be a reference for you, and I will do my best, just as you have done for
me.
On 5/5/2016 at 12:58 PM, Allin Cottrell wrote:
>On Thu, 5 May 2016,
That's weird! I've never heard of a Linux distribution that also has
precompiled packages for Win32. I will check it out at my earliest
convenience. You mentioned GTK2, but I am hoping it also has (or has switched
over to) GTK3.
I hope this isn't too good to be true. I will be too busy to check fo
On Thu, 5 May 2016, Andrew Robinson wrote:
So is that how to actually get help on the GTK Dev forums? Beg for help?
(This in response to Lucas Levrel's suggesting a "please" following
the imperative "show me your source code.")
LL was merely requesting a little civility. In many years of re
So is that how to actually get help on the GTK Dev forums? Beg for help? I
thought posting a problem would be enough, but okay then ... pretty please
help me ...
Your source code doesn't work, so let's compare environments. I have:
1) Windows7
2) Win32 version of GTK+, version 3.18
3) The pathnam
Note that if you are using fedora (and possibly other Linux distributions)
it comes with lots of win32 packages precompiled. E.g. all you need to do
to get gtk2 and its dependencies is to do:
dnf install mingw32-gtk2
You can then compile your gtk programs for windows through cross
compilation
On 5/5/2016 at 10:23 AM, Lucas Levrel wrote:
>Le 5 mai 2016, Andrew Robinson a écrit :
>
>> So if I don't want to make my on copy of the GTK+ libraries,
>
>Why wouldn't you want to build your static libs for future inclusion in
>your software? Where "build" is for "let the Makefile of MXE do all
Le 5 mai 2016, Andrew Robinson a écrit :
Actually, MXE isn't a compiler, but a Makefile that compiles a cross compiler.
OK.
So if I don't want to make my on copy of the GTK+ libraries,
Why wouldn't you want to build your static libs for future inclusion in
your software? Where "build" is
Le 5 mai 2016, Andrew Robinson a écrit :
I've just tested a filename containing spaces and U+221E (infinity
symbol), writing and reading both work.
So you verified that in Windows using the Win32 version of GTK+? Show me your
source code.
"Please."
Cross-compiled on Linux with i686-pc-mingw32
So you verified that in Windows using the Win32 version of GTK+? Show me your
source code.
On 5/5/2016 at 3:57 AM, Lucas Levrel wrote:
>Le 3 mai 2016, Andrew Robinson a écrit :
>
>>> I don't think I tried filenames with spaces, but I did test filenames with
>>> accented letters in both Linux and
Actually, MXE isn't a compiler, but a Makefile that compiles a cross compiler.
So if I don't want to make my on copy of the GTK+ libraries, I must tell
grandma and grandpa to get their own copy of MSYS2 and MXE, and provide make
their own copy of GTK+ for Win32. Wouldn't that be easy and fun?
On
Le 3 mai 2016, Andrew Robinson a écrit :
I don't think I tried filenames with spaces, but I did test filenames with
accented letters in both Linux and Windows, and it worked (using GTK2).
E.g. for reading a file contents into one big string I have this:
I don't know about accented letters, sin
Le 3 mai 2016, Andrew Robinson a écrit :
Is it really necessary for every Windows application bundle to ship its
own copy of GTK+?
By default MXE links statically. So you don't have any dll to bundle with
your app. In such circumstances, what does LGPL say? Do you still have to
provide the GT
12 matches
Mail list logo