On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:53:01 +0200
Paolo wrote:
> Hi! I have a problem about the update and refresh of a tree. This is
> the situation: I have a populated tree and a button that update the
> tree. The button's event calls a function that permorfs the following
> things: 1) Reset the treemodel appe
On 21 Sep 2011, at 16:50, Chris Vine wrote:
>
> The LGPL-2.1 itself says "This is the first released version of the
> Lesser GPL. It also counts as the successor of the GNU Library Public
> License, version 2, hence the version number 2.1".
>
Ah yes, you're right. It's a bit easy to miss but
Hi! I have a problem about the update and refresh of a tree. This is the
situation: I have a populated tree and a button that update the tree. The
button's event calls a function that permorfs the following things:
1) Reset the treemodel appending a single text row "Loading"
2) Execute a db query
3
On 09/12/2011 11:33 PM, Craig wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 22:20 +0200, Florian Müllner wrote:
>> You are modifying the list in the loop until g_list_next() returns
>> NULL ...
>
> Right. I understand this now. However, I thought using g_list_first()
> would set GList *events back to the firs
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:50:29 +0100
Chris Vine wrote:
> [ship] Some developers (the
> linux kernel developers in particular) do not like this, and do not
> include the "or (at your option) any later version".
I should say that I realise that the kernel is released under the GPL
and not the LGPL, b
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:13:56 +0100
John Emmas wrote:
> An interesting point. Technically, the "Library" GPL and the
> "Lesser" GPL aren't the same document - even though they might have
> the same wording. Just as a loan agreement signed by me isn't the
> same legal instrument as one signed by m
