Re: GtkGLExt (was Re: Gtk 3.0)

On 12/05/2009 12:28 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 18:11 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote: I have the impression that my message is not coming through correctly, because I keep saying the same things. :-) I never said that raw OperGL is not used, or not useful; I just contend tha

Re: GtkGLExt (was Re: Gtk 3.0)

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > (Sorry, I'm sending this via my phone so it's not going to be nicely > formatted; I apologize) > > I'm really not working on it - mainly for three reasons: 1) if you want to > use GL, GtkGlExt is "good enough" and integrating it into gtk+ it

Re: GtkGLExt (was Re: Gtk 3.0)

2009/12/4 Carlos Pereira : > 3) However GtkGlExt is not GTK-3.0 ready, because it cannot be compiled with > SEAL_ENABLE and SINGLE_INCLUDES... Bug and patch filled upstream for SINGLE_INCLUDES issue: [1] Also, I've found some interesting threads about this topic here [2] (Sept 2003) and here [3]

Re: GtkGLExt (was Re: Gtk 3.0)

On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 18:11 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote: I have the impression that my message is not coming through correctly, because I keep saying the same things. :-) > > I never said that raw OperGL is not used, or not useful; I just contend > > that being able to drop into GL directly is

Re: GtkGLExt (was Re: Gtk 3.0)

Emmanuele Bassi wrote: On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 20:51 +, Carlos Pereira wrote: Hi Emmanuele, I'm really not working on it - mainly for three reasons: 1) if you want to use GL, GtkGlExt is "good enough" and integrating it into gtk+ it's not a good idea; 1) If you think GtkGlExt should not be in

Re: GtkGLExt (was Re: Gtk 3.0)

On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 22:26 +0100, David Nečas wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 08:51:54PM +, Carlos Pereira wrote: > >> I'm really not working on it - mainly for three reasons: 1) if you want to > >> use GL, GtkGlExt is "good enough" and integrating it into gtk+ it's not a > >> good idea; > >

Re: GtkGLExt (was Re: Gtk 3.0)

On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 20:51 +, Carlos Pereira wrote: > Hi Emmanuele, > > I'm really not working on it - mainly for three reasons: 1) if you want to > > use GL, GtkGlExt is "good enough" and integrating it into gtk+ it's not a > > good idea; > 1) If you think GtkGlExt should not be integrated wi

RE: GtkGLExt (was Re: Gtk 3.0)

I've sort of followed this chain sorry if I am rehashing something that has already been covered. IMHO I agree that GtkGLExt should be directly integrated into GTK. Most modern user interfaces (IE OS X (NextStep)) are integrating 3D directly into the windowing system. If I am not mistaken t

Re: GtkGLExt (was Re: Gtk 3.0)

On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 08:51:54PM +, Carlos Pereira wrote: >> I'm really not working on it - mainly for three reasons: 1) if you want to >> use GL, GtkGlExt is "good enough" and integrating it into gtk+ it's not a >> good idea; > > 2) GtkGlExt is good enough for GTK-2.0, I never had a single p

GDB error

Hi, I compile Hello world from official GTK tutorial this way: g++ -Wall -g main.cpp -o anc `pkg-config --cflags gtk+-2.0` `pkg-config --libs gtk+-2.0` Compilation is successfull and "Hello world button" program is running. But i have problems with debugging. I had them in Eclipse so I tried in co

Should gtk_widget_draw be un-depreicated?

Presently the function gtk_widget_draw is deprecated in favor of gtk_widget_queue_draw. I need the great minds of gtk to think of a way I've missed to accomplish a certain task, or consider un-deprecating gtk_widget_draw. The context is a multi threaded application using gtk. In a thread tha

Re: GtkGLExt (was Re: Gtk 3.0)

Hi Emmanuele, I'm really not working on it - mainly for three reasons: 1) if you want to use GL, GtkGlExt is "good enough" and integrating it into gtk+ it's not a good idea; 1) If you think GtkGlExt should not be integrated with GTK+ that's fine for me. 2) GtkGlExt is good enough for GTK-2.0,

Re: GtkGLExt (was Re: Gtk 3.0)

(Sorry, I'm sending this via my phone so it's not going to be nicely formatted; I apologize) I'm really not working on it - mainly for three reasons: 1) if you want to use GL, GtkGlExt is "good enough" and integrating it into gtk+ it's not a good idea; 2) cairo should get GPU acceleration for 2D d

Re: GtkGLExt (was Re: Gtk 3.0)

Thanks Javier, it's good to know that EmmanueleBassi is now taking care of GtkGLExt integration with GTK... Regards, Carlos Hello Carlos, 2009/12/3 Carlos Pereira : That's why I asked in the first message of this thread, what are the plans regarding