On 08/26/2009 07:57 PM, Marshall Lake wrote:
> I have several g_idle_add() calls from within secondary threads. Is it
> okay for a secondary thread to end while an idle function it had added
> is still active?
Yup. All idle functions run in the main thread regardless of from while
thread they'r
A couple of questions with regard to threads and g_idle_add() which I
can't find references to anywhere. I suspect my questions are moot but I
want to make sure.
I have several g_idle_add() calls from within secondary threads. Is it
okay for a secondary thread to end while an idle function
RTFM, what a novel idea. Sorry, I should have done that. I'm having a
"duh" moment. Anyway, thanks for saving me the time.
> -Original Message-
> From: gtk-app-devel-list-boun...@gnome.org
> [mailto:gtk-app-devel-list-boun...@gnome.org] On Behalf Of
> Brian J. Tarricone
> Sent: Wednesd
On 08/26/2009 12:55 PM, Boggess Rod wrote:
> Before someone suggests the GTK_EXPAND option when attaching to the
> table, I tried that. It works horizontally, but not vertically.
AFAICT, you can't make it expand vertically. A quick reading of the gtk
source suggests that it always requests the h
Before someone suggests the GTK_EXPAND option when attaching to the
table, I tried that. It works horizontally, but not vertically. At
least on HP UX, that dog won't hunt. Just to be sure I wasn't doing
something wrong, I added a frame (no label, GTK_SHADOW_IN), and it
expands in both directions
I use a GtkImage, and choose among GTK_STOCK_YES and GTK_STOCK_NO. At
least for all the themes I've tried it with, it either shows a
green/red ball, a check/cross or some variation, but imo, it gets the
message across.
2009/8/26 David Nečas :
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 01:07:33PM -0400, Boggess Rod
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 01:07:33PM -0400, Boggess Rod wrote:
> Although, if you want to be 3133t programmer, go with the
> custom image.
A custom image is the last resort. You need to make it look good with
light themes, dark themes, large fonts, etc.
Yeti
__
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:55:41AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Dave Howorth on 08/26/2009 04:00 AM wrote:
> >
> > I'm surprised nobody has mentioned gtk_widget_set_sensitive()
>
> +1
>
> Setting a FALSE sensitivity would be the normal thing to do that normal
> users would expect to see.
> -Original Message-
> Dave Howorth on 08/26/2009 04:00 AM wrote:
> >
> > I'm surprised nobody has mentioned gtk_widget_set_sensitive()
> >
>
> +1
>
> Setting a FALSE sensitivity would be the normal thing to do
> that normal users would expect to see.
>
> If you want to be a "l33t"
Hi all,
given a piece of codes:
GStaticMutex mutex = G_STATIC_MUTEX_INIT;
func()
{
g_static_mutex_lock (&mutex);
}
gcc give me a warning like this:
---> deferencing type punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
this warning mostly on g_static_mutex*() operation
It's on gcc-4.3.2, gli
Dave Howorth on 08/26/2009 04:00 AM wrote:
>
> I'm surprised nobody has mentioned gtk_widget_set_sensitive()
>
+1
Setting a FALSE sensitivity would be the normal thing to do that normal
users would expect to see.
If you want to be a "l33t" programmer and program a custom method for a
custom gr
On 08/20/2009 10:27 PM, Patrick M. Rutkowski wrote:
> I've written a test case that anybody can compile and run:
> http://www.rutski89.com/static/event_test.c
>
> It contains the following line of code in the any_event() function:
> printf("IT WORKS!\n");
>
> That currently does not get printed.
Hi all
If the column is sorted, when one activates the toggle, the tree is
re-sorted (normal) but the selected row is changed (unexpected). I
investigated and I found that when clicking on a toggle cell renderer, the
"activate" callback is send which update the treemodel. After re-ordering,
the fu
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:00:43AM +0100, Dave Howorth wrote:
>
> I'm surprised nobody has mentioned gtk_widget_set_sensitive()
Probably because of how it typically looks...
Yeti
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://
Edheldil wrote:
> Hi,
> since the checkbox is not interactive, you can as well get rid of it and
> replace it with an image or even with a simple label. No need to confuse
> user with an apparently non-working control.
>
> Edheldil
>
>
> donglongchao wrote:
>> I want to use some GtkCheckButton t
Hi,
since the checkbox is not interactive, you can as well get rid of it and
replace it with an image or even with a simple label. No need to confuse
user with an apparently non-working control.
Edheldil
donglongchao wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I want to use some GtkCheckButton to display some status i
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 04:23:34PM +0800, donglongchao wrote:
> I want to use some GtkCheckButton to display some status in my app.But I want
> to forbid my customer to change these checkbuttons' status(choosed or not )
> by their hands,and they can only be changed by my app itself according to
Hi, all
I want to use some GtkCheckButton to display some status in my app.But I want
to forbid my customer to change these checkbuttons' status(choosed or not ) by
their hands,and they can only be changed by my app itself according to some
values,etc..I want to know how to do this.Will some o
18 matches
Mail list logo
