hi,
Mike Massonnet schrieb:
> Le Mon, 6 Oct 2008 16:13:25 +0800,
> "chen zhixin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
>
>> hello
>> i have to scale the image i recived,NTSC,30f/s,yuyv->gray and 720*480
>> because i need to do something on image,so i use gray->pixmap,and use
>> cairo_t to do .
>> the
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Daniel Yek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> That (custom composite widget) is one approach I know of, but that doesn't
> allow me to manipulate the composite widget's children in Glade easily
> without more work.
>
> That is, if I stick to the standard GtkVBox, I
[Apologize for being lengthy, but at least I'm trying hard to be clear...]
Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
ok for the sake of this conversation: you are trying to integrate your
custom
widget into glade,
That (custom composite widget) is one approach I know of, but that
doesn't allow me to manipul
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Daniel Yek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Hi Tristan,
>
> No, I think I got the "pluggable" term from the following Wikipedia page.
> Yeah, the term is probably too confusing to use besides serving as a general
> explanation in the article.
ok for the sake of t
Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:10 AM, Daniel Yek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
This is done by installing custom widgets catalog into catalog directory,
installing custom plugin libraries, loading optional/custom plugin
libraries, installing and loading glade-3 custom
2008/10/21 Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> speaking of that, as there are other Windows library, not related to gtk,
> that may use libjpeg, tiff, png, etc..., woud it be possible to install them
> in a drectory not specific to GTK (like in Program Files/Common
> Files/generic, or something li
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/10/21 Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
But I admit I don't have any *really* strong preference. If it really
is so that the majority of people who distribute GTK+ apps on Windows
would prefer that the pixbuf loaders were separate DLLs I can
I've updated my GTK build for Windows from the previous version to the
latest GTK 2.14.4.
The first thing I've noticed that my print preview stopped working
correctly.
Now I get the empty white preview window, meaning no text that I draw on it
is being displayed.
Reverting to the older cairo
2008/10/21 Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> But I admit I don't have any *really* strong preference. If it really
> is so that the majority of people who distribute GTK+ apps on Windows
> would prefer that the pixbuf loaders were separate DLLs I can return
> to that. Is there anybody out there
> Sorry (just out of ignorance): who or what forced you to revert to
> the libjpeg- and libtiff-based loaders?
The GDI+ ones don't work... They work for "small" files, but if the
file size (not the image size!) is larger than a limit that seems to
be around 60 KB, loading fails... See bug #552678.
10 matches
Mail list logo
