Re: GTK+ Windows dependancies

2008-01-31 Thread Allin Cottrell
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > In particular, the "loaders" directory is now gone due to Tor's > > decision to build a monolithic gdkpixbuf library for GTK on > > Windows, with all the loaders pre-embedded. Personally, I wish > > he'd reconsider that. > > OK, you are the secon

Re: What's wrong with the docs?

2008-01-31 Thread Thomas Stover
I feel the same way. I can't think of an example off of the top of my head, but I swear there have been things that the only way I figured them out was by reading the python documentation and sort of guessing at the C API. Yes I look at the reference docs on gtk.org and gnome.org. > Date: Wed, 3

Re: GTK+ Windows dependancies

2008-01-31 Thread gege2061
I looked the gimp install directory and I found this files : - bin/*.dll - etc/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf.loaders - etc/gtk-2.0/gtk.immodules - etc/gtk-2.0/gtkrc - etc/pango/pango.aliases - etc/pango/pango.modules - lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/* - lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/* - lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.

Re: Does libX11 use shared memory between several clients?

2008-01-31 Thread Tristan Van Berkom
On Jan 29, 2008 5:35 AM, Bin Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > I can't see any code to transfer modified "display" structure to the > server, this API is invoked by a XIM server so obviously the register > stuff need to be accessed by other process, is there any shared memory > trick in li

Re: buildable_set_name

2008-01-31 Thread Johan Dahlin
amol wrote: > Hi, > When we do gtk_buildable_set/get_name for any object created through > GtkBuilder, GtkBuildable does g_object_set/get_data to return the > corresponding name of object if its set/get_name are not overridden. > But GtkWidget overrides set/get_name of buildable interface and doe

Re: GTK+ Windows dependancies

2008-01-31 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> > I would recommend *not* installing packages from other sources in your > > MinGW folder. > I did not know. It is better to install them in the directory of Code:Blocks > (my IDE)? No, that would also be mixing stuff from separate sources. I would install them in a totally separate folder. --

Re: GTK+ Windows dependancies

2008-01-31 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> In particular, the "loaders" directory is now gone due to Tor's > decision to build a monolithic gdkpixbuf library for GTK on > Windows, with all the loaders pre-embedded. Personally, I wish > he'd reconsider that. OK, you are the second person to oppose this change (if I recall correctly),