Michael,
Thanks for the feedback, it seems we are on the same page on several counts.
James,
- Original Message
From: Michael L Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 5:32:22 PM
Subject: Re: C vs C++ for GTK
JAMES SCOTT wrote:
> To
>From the man page for sleep(3):
BUGS
sleep() may be implemented using SIGALRM; mixing calls to alarm() and
sleep() is a bad idea.
My guess is that the file dialog has set up something to let it know if
some part of it is taking too long, and is using alarm() for that.
I
GTK+ 2.12.2 is now available for download at:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gtk+/2.12/
gtk+-2.12.2.tar.bz2 md5sum: a789a8a333d418f47cda1dba106d9aac
gtk+-2.12.2.tar.gzmd5sum: f9419fc55e6f37f6889c6b0e1cd63e0f
This is a bugfix release in the 2.12 series.
What is GTK+
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 12:04 +0100, Dan H wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 00:03:14 +0100
> Tomas Carnecky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Am I limited with C?
> > No, there are very few features in C++ that are hard/impossible to
> > imitate in C, but you usually won't need those for small project
Maybe I'm just doing something stupid here. But I'd
like to know what, at least!
Below is an example of a mysterious (well, mysterious
to me) problem I've encountered, involving some sort
of interaction between a gtk_file_chooser_dialog_new
and I thought was a completely separate thread.
I'm hopi
JAMES SCOTT wrote:
> To list members following this subject: I have a question - not a
> flame, as I try to understand the diversity of responses to this
> topic.
>
> How many of you who have suggested "Patrick" learn something other
> than C, know C already for yourself. Over the course of my
>
- Forwarded Message
From: JAMES SCOTT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Michael L Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 2:37:18 PM
Subject: Re: C vs C++ for GTK
To list members following this subject: I have a question - not a flame, as I
try to understand the diversity of r
Hi Micheal
Indeed, good advice!
I am planning on using Python for everything I can. I just need a little
extra speed for data collection and threading during collection.
I think I will learn C so that I can re-use code from other open source
projects.
All of this advice has been great, thanks
Patrick wrote:
> Hi Everyone.
>
> Sorry for the flame war bait, I know how passionate language debates
> get but I need some guidance. I am using PyGTK right now and I am happy
> with it, but a day is coming soon were the speed limitations and
> less-then-straight-forward threading will be an
Benoît Dejean wrote:
>> In fact the GObject library (on which GTK is based) is an example of
>> how full object-orientation can be achieved in C. Of course other C++
>> features like templates, operator overloading (ugh!) and namespaces
>> are unique.
>
> This is totally a blocker for beginners
Le lundi 26 novembre 2007 à 12:04 +0100, Dan H a écrit :
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 00:03:14 +0100
> Tomas Carnecky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Am I limited with C?
> > No, there are very few features in C++ that are hard/impossible to
> > imitate in C, but you usually won't need those for smal
Le lundi 26 novembre 2007 à 08:39 +, Neil Bird a écrit :
> Around about 25/11/07 12:31, Benoît Dejean typed ...
> > I've switched gnome-system-monitor to C++ and i'm very happy with it.
>
>Just out of interest, did you choose GTKmm or C++ with vanilla GTK+?
As i didn't start from scratch
Le dimanche 25 novembre 2007 à 10:47 +0100, Tomas Carnecky a écrit :
> Allin Cottrell wrote:
> > One reason for going with C is that the great bulk of free
> > software is in C, including GLib and GTK. The main exception
> > is Qt, the basis for KDE. So if you might want to get into KDE
> > p
Le lundi 26 novembre 2007 à 15:56 +0100, Fernando Apesteguía a écrit :
> On 11/25/07, Benoît Dejean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I've switched gnome-system-monitor to C++ and i'm very happy with it.
It's still 95% Gtk + 5% Gtkmm
> Two questions about the sentence above:
>
> - What improve
On 11/25/07, Benoît Dejean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Le dimanche 25 novembre 2007 à 00:03 +0100, Tomas Carnecky a écrit :
> > Patrick wrote:
> > > is C++ to complicated?
> > C++ is more complex than C, and thus harder to fully understand.
> >
> > > Is C going out of date?
> > No, it's still be
2007/11/24, Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Patrick,
> I can only spend 8-12 hours a week programming, I am not a professional
> programmer, is C++ to complicated? Is C going out of date? Am I limited
> with C?
Before to switch to a new language are you sure that python is so slow
that you can't
2007/11/22, Miroslav Rajcic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I am having a text like "0bullet" inside of GtkTextView, where the first
> character is a bullet sign and the rest is the ordinary text
> I need to be able to format this text to insert some space gap between the
> bullet and the rest (should loo
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 00:03:14 +0100
Tomas Carnecky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am I limited with C?
> No, there are very few features in C++ that are hard/impossible to
> imitate in C, but you usually won't need those for small projects.
In fact the GObject library (on which GTK is based) is an
Around about 25/11/07 12:31, Benoît Dejean typed ...
> I've switched gnome-system-monitor to C++ and i'm very happy with it.
Just out of interest, did you choose GTKmm or C++ with vanilla GTK+?
I'm looking at doing some GTK from C++ (I've previously only really used
GTK+ from C), and on th
19 matches
Mail list logo
