[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 7/6/07, Ernie Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > (now someone will tell me the compiler is correct and casting "int
>> > *x[]" to "void **" is indeed wrong :-)
>>
>> This is question 4.9 in the C FAQ:
>>
>> http://c-faq.com/ptrs/genericpp.html
>
>
> That'
hi,
please stop reffering to that tutorial under that address. Its part of GObject
API docs since more that a year and has also be updated in there since.
Stefan
Arx Cruz wrote:
> http://le-hacker.org/papers/gobject/
>
> Great tutorial!
>
> On 7/4/07, Lucas Stephanou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/6/07, Ernie Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (now someone will tell me the compiler is correct and casting "int
> > *x[]" to "void **" is indeed wrong :-)
>
> This is question 4.9 in the C FAQ:
>
> http://c-faq.com/ptrs/genericpp.html
That's very interesting, thank you. Does that mea
On 7/6/07, Alan M. Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's interesting. Unfortunately for me, I don't have a lot of casting
> options. Really, in this case:
I meant that whatever it is that g_static_mutex_*() is doing, it might
be doing a cast like this internally. Therefore you may have found a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (now someone will tell me the compiler is correct and casting "int
> *x[]" to "void **" is indeed wrong :-)
This is question 4.9 in the C FAQ:
http://c-faq.com/ptrs/genericpp.html
- Ernie http://home.comcast.net/~erniew
___
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 16:47 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think this is a gcc 4.1 issue. I found I couldn't cast from a Thing
> *x[] to a void ** in one step without triggering a warning like this.
> If I cast to void* and then to void **, all was well.
>
> Anyway, insert a mysterious extra
You wrote
> I think this is a gcc 4.1 issue.
4.0.x IIRC
ralf
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 08:22 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 08:00 -0700, Alan M. Evans wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 09:27 +0200, Jonathan Winterflood wrote:
> > > Wouldn't that be
> > > typedef struct MyMutex MyMutex;
> > > rather?
> > >
> > > Or for short :
> > > typed
Excuse me but I'm new to GTK+: at which moment I have to call the system()
function to run the external program I need (a web browser, in this case)? Do I
have to use two different source files to implement this mechanism (run the app
as a GtkPlug, give it the ID of the GtkSocket, ecc.)? If not, wh
On 7/5/07, Alan M. Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But with optimizations on (actually, at or above -O2), I get warnings
> about type-punning on the calls to g_static_mutex_lock/unlock:
>
> g++ -O2 -Wall -c `pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0` test.cpp
> test.cpp: In function 'void MyM
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 08:00 -0700, Alan M. Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 09:27 +0200, Jonathan Winterflood wrote:
> > Wouldn't that be
> > typedef struct MyMutex MyMutex;
> > rather?
> >
> > Or for short :
> > typedex struct _MyMutex {
> > GStaticMutex mutex;
> > } MyMutex;
>
> Hi. Tha
[Resending, sorry. Screwed up and sent my last reply from the wrong
account.]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]&*! mail program! Did it again...]]
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 09:27 +0200, Jonathan Winterflood wrote:
> Wouldn't that be
> typedef struct MyMutex MyMutex;
> rather?
>
> Or for short :
> typedex struct _My
Hi,
I don't know how to go about it, but usually video playing is done using
'overlay': the area in the app is painted bright green, or pink (some
particular color) and the graphics card overlays the video onto any area
that color inside the coordinates specified by your program.
I think that woul
Hi,
You may use GtkSocket(in Host App) and GtkPlug(in Embedded App) for this.
Regards,
Siddharth
TATA Elxsi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 7:24 PM
To: GTK+ mailing list
Subject: Running externa
Hi everybody.
Do anyone know how to include an external program to a widget of the main
window?
I have a main window containing a notebook, and in one of the notebook's tab I
want to show an instance of a browser (Opera) inside a GtkDrawingArea(), and
not to show the external program in its own new
Gabriele Greco wrote:
Just correcting the title of my previous post, obviously I intended
WITHOUT SDL or any external library (except the one I use to decode the
stream :) ).
> Someone can point me some code that does video playback using *only* GTK?
>
> If the code is not available also some di
Dear all,
--
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | <--- (C), This is a gtk scrolled
window named (C)
--
- --
| 1 | | o o o o o o o o o |
| 2 | | o o o o o o o o o |
| 3 |
Jonathan Winterflood schrieb:
> Wouldn't that be
> typedef struct MyMutex MyMutex;
> rather?
>
> Or for short :
> typedex struct _MyMutex {
>GStaticMutex mutex;
> } MyMutex;
Exactly. I should read my mail again, before sending it
Cheers, Andy
_
Someone can point me some code that does video playback using *only* GTK?
If the code is not available also some directions will be enough:
- What kind of widget to use? (GtkDrawingArea, GtkImage...)
- How to handle double buffering? (perform a queue_draw after each frame
update?)
- How to blit e
Wouldn't that be
typedef struct MyMutex MyMutex;
rather?
Or for short :
typedex struct _MyMutex {
GStaticMutex mutex;
} MyMutex;
Cheers,
Jonathan
On 7/6/07, Andreas Stricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Alan M. Evans schrieb:
> > struct MyMutex {
> > GStaticMutex mutex;
Alan M. Evans schrieb:
> struct MyMutex {
> GStaticMutex mutex;
> };
Unless you add a define like "typedef MyMutex MyMutex" you have to
add the "struct" keyword. Otherwise this is an incomplete type the
compiler grouch about:
> MyMutex * MyMutex_new() {
21 matches
Mail list logo
