Dear Sir/Madam,
I am really thankful to Free/Open Source Software development community for
their overwhelming response to the survey on practices and problems of
defect management in Free/Open Source Software projects.
If you have not participated ealier, you may spend a few minutes now too.
Francesco Montorsi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tristan Van Berkom ha scritto:
>> IIRC it was discontinued recently (the cvs repo /was/ around
>> for a few months following the migration though).
>>
>> http://live.gnome.org/SubversionFAQ
> thanks!
>
> it would be nice to update also the FAQ on the www.
Yup.
Yeah, it's kind of difficult. I tried and gave up. It was easier just to use
the
shared libraries (DLLs) and other files and install them along with my program.
Reed
Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Fabrice Le Goff writes:
> > Is there a way to statically link with the Gtk+2.x lib ? I use either
> >
Hi,
Tristan Van Berkom ha scritto:
> IIRC it was discontinued recently (the cvs repo /was/ around
> for a few months following the migration though).
>
> http://live.gnome.org/SubversionFAQ
thanks!
it would be nice to update also the FAQ on the www.gtk.org website :)
Francesco
--
__
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:08:53PM +0200, Francesco Montorsi wrote:
>the only document I could find for checking out the CVS repo of GTK+
> is this:
>
> http://www.gtk.org/faq/#AEN325
>
> and it seems out of date since if I follow the istructions I get:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/work$ CVSROOT
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 16:08 +0200, Francesco Montorsi wrote:
> Hi,
>the only document I could find for checking out the CVS repo of GTK+
> is this:
>
> http://www.gtk.org/faq/#AEN325
>
> and it seems out of date since if I follow the istructions I get:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/work$ CVSROOT=
Hi,
the only document I could find for checking out the CVS repo of GTK+
is this:
http://www.gtk.org/faq/#AEN325
and it seems out of date since if I follow the istructions I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/work$ CVSROOT=':pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/gnome'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/work$ export CVSRO
