On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 17:02 -0800, C.R. Kirkwood-Watts wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> James Scott Jr wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 02:15 -0500, Freddie Unpenstein wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon 10/23, James Scott Jr < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >>> I am about to write
> However, I learned that for quite a number of methods it is
> a good idea to drop the deprecated ones and instead
> use the replacements (less buggy, better UI, better source code
> readability, less source code, better performance).
> Usually it should indeed make sense, because otherwise there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Scott Jr wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 02:15 -0500, Freddie Unpenstein wrote:
>
>> On Mon 10/23, James Scott Jr < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>>> I am about to write the socket module of a program that follows the
>>> gnu standard structure for
On Monday 13 November 2006 22:36, David Nečas (Yeti) wrote:
> Mass removal of deprecated symbols *only* for the purpose of
> removal of deprecated symbols is a good method to waste time
> and bring new bugs.
my understanding of "deprecated" is that those methods are not
maintained anymore. Or at l
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 01:02:57PM +0100, Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
>
> No, I do not have 2.4 at hand. It is not handy to always install
> the version that is the targetted minimum version of GTK+.
> Today it is 2.4, tomorrow (for another project) 2.2 etc.
I don't think downloading and unpacking o
Andrea Zagli wrote:
> Il giorno dom, 12/11/2006 alle 11.20 -0500, Tristan Van Berkom ha
> scritto:
>
>>That is normal, I wouldnt expect calling gtk_widget_destroy() to
>>destroy your window, its the combination of calling gtk_widget_destroy()
>>*and returning to the mainloop* that will actually re
Il giorno dom, 12/11/2006 alle 11.20 -0500, Tristan Van Berkom ha
scritto:
> That is normal, I wouldnt expect calling gtk_widget_destroy() to
> destroy your window, its the combination of calling gtk_widget_destroy()
> *and returning to the mainloop* that will actually remove the visible
> window,
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 02:15 -0500, Freddie Unpenstein wrote:
> On Mon 10/23, James Scott Jr < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > I am about to write the socket module of a program that follows the
> > gnu standard structure for a daemon. I am using glib wherever
> > possible and have a question concer
On Monday 13 November 2006 08:20, David Nečas (Yeti) wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 12:28:29AM +0100, Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
> > I wonder whether it is feasible to accompany the index of deprecated
> > symbols
> > [1] with the GTK+ version number describing since when the symbol is
> > depre
