On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 08:48 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> Just wanted to check: is the statement by Tor Lillqvist at
>
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316878
>
> the "last word" on this issue? (The issue concerns gtk, cairo,
> and fonts on win98.) Tor says -- or rather, asks:
>
>
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 10:02 +0200, Atanas Atanasov wrote:
> I managed to make it partially modal using a combination of functions:
> set_modal, grab_add and set_transient_for. However I can still say
> resize the window behind. It seems as you said that this i supposed to
> be the behaviour since g
I personally like it very much: it's very keyboard friendly. Some
people will find it a little disturbing that there's no visible direct
textbox to type in, and i would agree. Not a problem for newbies who
only use the mouse to select anyway, but a little frustrating for
people who wish to use t
I always had a problem with the icons although I am changing the icons
directory in the .gladep file to the one I want to use I never get the
icons, well unless I place them on the same directory as the binary program.
Any clues?
--
-- Yiannis
___
Hello!
> ...
>
> I will explain why I dislike new approach:
>
> 1. For example I want to select file from /usr/bin. I type:
>/u and '/usr' appears. As new user I type 'u' and then 's'
>and get '/usr/src' instead of '/us'. OK, thats bad, but fixable.
>I go back and remove all the line,
Hello,
I specifically subscribed to developers mailing list to tell that
I absolutely dislike new File Open dialog which has been implemented
some time ago. I find it very misleading, and unusable, and I do
not understand how this thing even happen to Linux. I always
felt that Linux is very good
