On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have to develop a portable application with GTK+2 and i just
want to be sure it will work. So my question is : is there any
difference between GTK+2 for windows and GTK+2 for Linux?
From the point of view of functionality available to the user,
Ricardo Malafaia writed:
all: test
test.exe: test.c
gcc.exe $(GTK_CFLAGS) $(GTK_LIBS) teste.c -o test.exe
try to put $(GTK_LIBS) to the end of the command line
gcc.exe $(GTK_CFLAGS) -o test.exe teste.c $(GTK_LIBS)
___
gtk-app-dev
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Gus Koppel wrote:
Somehow I even got i18n support functional on a GTK+ Windows
application.
IMO, this is unproblematic and expected. If you have the facility
to create valid message catalogs, this should Just Work.
Allin Cottrell
__
> > I was wondering how it is possible to sense when a widget is
> > closed by the user and send change a specific variable as a
> > result.
> Either connect to "destroy" signal, or use g_object_weak_ref().
> The handler can change a global variable.
If you store the pointer to the window in a g
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 09:37:49AM +0200, Gus Koppel wrote:
>
> Makefiles are not supposed to contain (or evaluate, rather)
> "`"-expressions.
Why not? Backquotes work with most shells and thus you
don't depend on GNU make.
Anyway, make never evaluates ``-expressions, see below.
I have a Makefi
Ricardo Malafaia wrote:
> well, my Makefile is like this now
>
> PREFIX=/mingw
> PATH=/d/GtkWin/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/mingw/bin
> CPPFLAGS=-O2 -I/d/GtkWin/include
> PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/d/GtkWin/lib/pkgconfig
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/d/GtkWin/bin:/d/GtkWin/lib:/lib:/usr/lib:/mingw/lib
>
> GTK_CFLAGS=`pkg-con
> In my application I am using a widget, say vbox.
> When that widget is destroyed, I want to delete all
> the associated objects that I allocated. So, I
> attached a delete_event and destroy_event callback.
> But this callback is not called, when I destroy the
> container of the vbox.
Im able to
