From: Chris Vogel
When generating grub.cfg using grub-mkconfig and the scripts 10_linux and
20_linux_xen there is no way to add kernel command line parameters _only_ to
the recovery entries generated.
This is needed to e.g. start a debug shell in installations using systemd
using the kernel
From: Chris Vogel
When generating grub.cfg using grub-mkconfig and the scripts 10_linux and
20_linux_xen there is no way to add kernel command line parameters _only_ to
the recovery entries generated.
This is needed to e.g. start a debug shell in installations using systemd
using the kernel
s a lot better
than nothing. I really don't think it's ok for grub-mkconfig to assume
something else is going to properly sync, unmount, or remount-ro whatever
file system the grub.cfg is being written to. grub-mkconfig needs to take
responsibility for its own action, and ensure complete and
pproximate time frame for getting this
fixed, to know whether for Fedora 29 /boot on XFS should be inhibited
until a proper tested patch for GRUB exists.
Thanks,
--
Chris Murphy
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 6:33 AM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 01:12:27PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> xfsprogs 4.16.0 defaults to enabling "sparse inode" which is not
>> compatible with GRUB.
>>
>> Dow
gt; contiguous 64-inode chunk. This way any files the grub tests add and
>> traverse would be in such a fragmented inode allocation. Tests passed,
>> but I'm not sure how to cleanly integrate that into the test harness.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen
>
> Eric,
? This used to be safe, but now with reflink
support, grubenv could be reflink copied, meaning any overwrite is
disallowed and must be COW'd. How is that handled?
I'm pretty sure on Btrfs GRUB knows is can't write to grubenv, I'm
just curious about the other case
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:59 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> GRUB code can certainly read files that are on Btrfs, md devices,
> LUKS, LVM, and so on. But GRUB code can also write to the physical
> block for grubenv - but are there safe guards that prevent it from
> doing s
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 01:40:06PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:59 PM, Chris Murphy
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > GRUB code can certainly read files that are on Btrfs,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 04:45:51PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 01:40:06PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Sep 17,
more than the first 4 MiB are needed, let me know.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1JgPv8EBHDn5A7hTEwewGK1MuFHvHbJnr
--
Chris Murphy
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
.
Fedora ISO's use isohybrid and have multiple partitions on their ISOs:
MBR, GPT, and APM.
https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/11285.html
--
Chris Murphy
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
ot either my Macbook Pro or my hp spectre (2016). I
have to MBR or GPT partition a USB stick, format it FAT32, and cp -a
the files onto it, that the HP will boot, still the Mac will not (that
2011 Mac will not USB boot with the CSM; CSM booting is only possib
ernel to get it to support faster storage devices such as NVMe.
A possible use case would be resuming from a hibernation image.
--
Chris Murphy
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 10:02 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
> SSD partition layout:
> 1 FAT32 EFI system partition (unused)
> 2 APFS (macOS)
> 3 HFS+ (used as ESP by Fedora)
> 4 Btrfs, sysroot
> 5 swap
> 6 Btrfs, sysroot
I goofed that up a bit:
1 FAT32 EFI system partition, unused
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 10:02 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> Hardware:
> Macboo Pro 8,2 (2001)
> (1) Samsung SSD drive
> (1) internal DVD-ROM drive
> (2) USB 2, nothing external connected but built-in keyboard shows up
> as USB device
> (1) wired ethernet
> firmware,
[
ce.
Photos of "lsefi" output
https://photos.app.goo.gl/pBxLJNdbzz6J9Vo56
--
Chris Murphy
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
volumes?
When I do 'ls (hdX)/' I consistently get an error from
efidisk.c:602:failure reading sector 0x80 for each of hd0, hd1, hd2,
hd3. For hd4 I get a different error which is fs.c:120:unknown file
system.
--
Chris Murphy
___
Grub-devel m
treat
loopback images any differently to physical disk images, and skip
verification of them. Files opened from the filesystem within a loopback
image will still be passed to verifier modules where required.
Signed-off-by: Chris Coulson
---
grub-core/disk/loopback.c | 3 ++-
1 file chang
t; wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020, 15:21 Chris Coulson
> mailto:chris.coul...@canonical.com>>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> When a file is verified, the entire contents of the verified
> file are
> &g
On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 14:33 +0200, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
> On Sat, 23 May 2020 12:21:27 +0100
> Chris Plant via Grub-devel wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 12:43 +0200, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
> > > On Fri, 22 May 2020 17:23:35 +0100
> > >
On Tue, 2020-09-22 at 08:33 +0200, Krystian Hebel wrote:
> On 21.09.2020 21:14, Chris Plant wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 14:33 +0200, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
> > > On Sat, 23 May 2020 12:21:27 +0100
> > > Chris Plant via Grub-devel wrote:
> > >
>
Hello,
Might be a stupid question, but how do I submit/propose changes to the
multiboot specification itself?
Should I just update the texinfo source from the website and attach
that to my patch?
Thanks,
Chris
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub
On Tue, 2020-09-22 at 07:53 +0100, Chris Plant wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-09-22 at 08:33 +0200, Krystian Hebel wrote:
> > On 21.09.2020 21:14, Chris Plant wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 14:33 +0200, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 23 May 2020 12:21:27
of ettique in the way these
patches are presented - I'm a bit new to this text patch process but
I've tried my best.
Signed-off-by: Chris Plant
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Define MULTIBOOT2_ARCHITECTURE_AARCH64 to support AARCH64 architecture
+ Define MULTIBOOT2_TAG_TYPE_ELF64_SECTIONS and struct
multiboot_tag_elf64_sections as a version of elf_sections which
correctly aligns the elf section headers to a 64 bit boundary
Signed-off-by: Chris Plant
---
include
Add ARM64 versions of the mmap functions to generate memory map for
multiboot2
Signed-off-by: Chris Plant
---
grub-core/mmap/arm64/uppermem.c | 72 +
include/grub/arm64/memory.h | 60 +++
2 files changed, 132 insertions(+)
create
Enable ARM64/aarch64 support in multiboot2 loader
Signed-off-by: Chris Plant
---
grub-core/loader/multiboot.c | 2 +-
grub-core/loader/multiboot_elfxx.c | 2 +-
grub-core/loader/multiboot_mbi2.c | 34 +++---
include/grub/arm64/multiboot.h | 56
Enable multiboot2 support for arm64-efi target
Signed-off-by: Chris Plant
---
grub-core/Makefile.core.def | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/grub-core/Makefile.core.def b/grub-core/Makefile.core.def
index b5f47fc41..2c0bec83d 100644
--- a/grub-core/Makefile.core.def
Add ARM64 relocator code to support multiboot2 loader
Signed-off-by: Chris plant
---
grub-core/lib/arm64/relocator.c | 267
grub-core/lib/arm64/relocator_asm.S | 57 ++
include/grub/arm64/relocator.h | 52 ++
3 files changed, 376 insertions
g
between the preboot and booted environments, which is the point of
grubenv, but it can't work much of the time due to the above
limitations.
--
Chris Murphy
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 2:08 AM Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 04:58:23PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It's not possible for GRUB pre-boot environment to write to grubenv
> > when it's on Btrfs, ZFS, LVM, mdadm raid,
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 3:17 AM Michael Chang via Grub-devel
wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 04:58:23PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It's not possible for GRUB pre-boot environment to write to grubenv
> > when it's on Btrfs, ZFS, LVM,
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 2:59 AM Michael Chang wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 08:36:05PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > So is the next era going to be we recommend /boot on FAT?
>
> No. I meant a new partition type only for grubenv files and keep
> everything else as is.
grubenv only for that purpose. I'd like to see
more consistency, fewer exceptions.
And that also means the old argument about the MBR gap. GRUB should
have its own partition here too.
Chris Murphy
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Hi,
Sorry for taking a while to look at this.
On 10/06/2021 12:55, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Daniel, dear Chris,
>
>
> Am 02.03.21 um 19:01 schrieb Daniel Kiper:
>> From: Chris Coulson
>>
>> grub_parser_split_cmdline() expands variable names present in the
>
le shouldn't see any difference.
Chris
diff --git a/docs/grub.texi b/docs/grub.texi
index f8b4b3b21..8b5482ee1 100644
--- a/docs/grub.texi
+++ b/docs/grub.texi
@@ -1411,6 +1411,14 @@ entry for recovery mode. This option lists command-line
arguments to add
only to the default menu ent
se. Or even make it explicitly a GRUB
bootloader partition type GUID. It's better if each bootloader has its
own? Originally BIOS Boot wasn't "owned" by GRUB, any bootloader can
use it, but insofar as I'm aware it's the only bootloader that uses
this partition typ
erated by usual means and runs fine otherwise.
Thanks,
Chris
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Thanks for the detailed reply, I think I’ve got to the bottom of this now, I
realised what I missed just after I sent this email.
> On 26 Oct 2021, at 13:35, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 08:46:06PM +0100, Chris Plant wrote:
>> Hello,
>&
Daniel,
I'm back home now and I have access to my PC again, so I can answer
more completely.
On Tue, 2021-10-26 at 14:51 +0100, Chris Plant wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed reply, I think I’ve got to the bottom of this
> now, I realised what I missed just after I sent this email.
&
On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 17:38 +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 08:16:36PM +0100, Chris Plant wrote:
> > Daniel,
> >
> > I'm back home now and I have access to my PC again, so I can answer
> > more completely.
> >
> > On Tue,
b.cfg much more generic and portable, searching
by partition types rather than by specific and unique file system or
partition UUIDs.
Thanks,
--
Chris Murphy
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Forgot to mention, I do see GRUB knows about "BIOS boot" partition
type guid, when it comes to the grub-install command. But I'm not sure
if GRUB as a concept of doing a search by arbitrary partition type
codes.
Thanks,
Chris Murphy
___
y will expand due
to the Windows 11 requirement that supporting hardware have TPM 2.0.
--
Chris Murphy
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
be made unambiguous, I'm not
super fussy how that's done. The advantage of this is permitting
static creation of configuration files, less dependency on customized
configuration.
--
Chris Murphy
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
t;BootNext" for this use case? Or else I guess distros need to consider
removing the creation of a Windows menu entry, as there's no point
creating menu entries that don't work.
--
Chris Murphy
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 10:18 AM Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 04:48:43PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > One idea I've heard floated is, having GRUB alter efivars such that
> > BootNext is changed to do a one time boot of Windows, instead of using
&
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:29 PM Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 11:46:33AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 10:18 AM Lennart Sorensen
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 04:48:43PM -0700, Chris Murph
such as W^X, call in to boot services
when an error occurs in order to log a message to the console before
automatically rebooting the machine.
Signed-off-by: Chris Coulson
---
grub-core/Makefile.core.def | 4 +++-
grub-core/kern/efi/init.c | 23 +--
2 files changed, 24
For all practical purposes, this is functionally the end to dual boot
in GRUB, if there is no work around, e.g. bootnext. Is that the
direction GRUB maintainers want to go in?
--
Chris Murphy
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 2:32 PM Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 9:14 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > For all practical purposes, this is functionally the end to dual boot
> > in GRUB, if there is no work around, e.g. bootne
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 5:00 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 2:32 PM Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 9:14 PM Chris Murphy
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > For all practical purposes, this
enu, which causes GRUB to use --bootnext to do a
one-time boot using that UEFI boot entry, thus loading that distro's signed
shim+GRUB combo.
Or, is this just not a priority for the foreseeable future, and users will
have to use the UEFI firmware's built-in boot manager for this u
for the foreseeable future, and users
will have to use the UEFI firmware's built-in boot manager for this
use case?
This seems related to thread: "How to boot Windows when Bitlocker
enabled with key sealed in TPM External"
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2022-02/msg00
ring up this specific firmware
menu though...
Thanks,
--
Chris Murphy
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
using by referring to MBR, which mainly
exists only at LBA 0. In the case of extended partitions, the EBR
(using the same MBR format) is still outside the LBA range for Btrfs
to apply fitrim ioctl. The VBR however, would be inside that range,
and it's that 64KiB boot
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Filipe Manana wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Andrei Borzenkov
>>> wrote:
>>>> As discussed on o
-. 1 root tty 4, 19 Aug 3 2017 tty19
crw--w. 1 chris tty 4, 2 Aug 3 2017 tty2
crw--w. 1 root tty 4, 20 Aug 3 2017 tty20
crw--w. 1 root tty 4, 21 Aug 3 2017 tty21
crw--w. 1 root tty 4, 22 Aug 3 2017 tty22
crw--w. 1 root tty
o as if whatever it finds there is not at
all helpful.
inside
< 693 225 0:6 / /dev rw,nosuid shared:22 - devtmpfs devtmpfs
rw,seclabel,size=3999060k,nr_inodes=999765,mode=755
outside
> 21 71 0:6 / /dev rw,nosuid shared:22 - devtmpfs devtmpfs
> rw,seclabel,size=3999060k,nr_ino
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> Upstream doesn't use grub2 prefix. Please try with latest upstream and make
> sure it's compiled with libdevmapper
Same result with current git as of today.
[chris@f26wnuc grub]$ ./configure --
paths are not really subvolumes. I hope that makes sense...
If grub-probe does not parse for subvol= then that's not likely the
problem here.
--
Chris Murphy
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
ated partitions in one of the partition maps.
Is there, or can we think of, a good way of handling this?
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On Monday 14 April 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Initially, all partmaps were arch-specific, so that "pc" arch had msdos
> and gpt partmaps, etc. This avoided the problem; so maybe what we could
> do is probe for "native" partmaps first, and then
On Monday 14 April 2008, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 10:21 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> >Instead of probing for partmaps in a particular order, it seems that
> > solving for this might best be done by probing for all of the possible
> > partmaps for the ar
inux 'make'
system is concerned, so the generic 'make install' method which is commonly
used on many systems will still allow it.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
ng
SMBIOS Reporting
Clear Security Chip (enable/disable)
Note says: "It will not be possible to access already-encrypted data
after these keys are cleared"
I think it's pretty clear that the intent is to report the above
information to the OS manufa
ate partition for /boot is
undesirable?
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Felix Zielcke asked me about the Apple/PC hybrid disk problem, so I'm trying
to figure out how to fix it. Sorry for letting this fall through the cracks;
this is from three months ago.
On Monday 14 April 2008, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 10:21 -0400, Chris Knad
Thanks for your pointsers, Pavel; they were all helpful.
On Tuesday 22 July 2008, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Quoting Chris Knadle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Since I want the first (high) 16 bits, I
> > think I need to make the comparison in a way such as:
> >
> &g
On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Chris Knadle wrote:
> Right now part_map_iterate() detects an Apple partition based on Sector 0
> [which is unavoidable, since Sector 0 is not going to have an HFS+ magic
> number]
Sorry, I meant *partition 0*, not Sector 0...
-- Chris
--
Chris Knad
'git-mv' to rename the file instead.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On Friday 25 July 2008, Bean wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Chris Knadle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Friday 25 July 2008, Bean wrote:
> >> 4. rename appleloader command to bootcamp
> >>
> >> The name appleloader may be a little confusing,
On Friday 25 July 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 04:47:42PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > > Right now part_map_iterate() detects an Apple partition based on Sector
> > > 0 [which is unavoidable,
On Friday 25 July 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 07:36:25PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> >If you ask me, I think this unfortunately looks like a complex
> > detection problem -- which I think is eventually going to start with a
> > *successful* d
On Monday 28 July 2008, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Montag, den 28.07.2008, 14:41 -0400 schrieb Chris Knadle:
> >However on the last test I did make an error and left out the -d
> > option to grub-probe, and that's required for the grub-probe to succeed,
> > so unfortu
On Monday 28 July 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 03:25:00PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > On Monday 28 July 2008, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > Am Montag, den 28.07.2008, 14:41 -0400 schrieb Chris Knadle:
> > > >However on the last test I did
On Tuesday 05 August 2008, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 07:36:25PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> >>If you ask me, I think this unfortunately looks like a complex
> >> detection problem -- which I t
s along with the device names on the disk. For doing a double-check,
have a look at the 'findfs' command.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
itrd image. Running '/sbin/modinfo ' should give you an
idea of whether a device driver module is disk related and thus required to
build-in.
> Thanks,
>
> PS I know the drive is 250GB but labeled 320G.
Is it? I didn't notice
> And sorry for the other post with the wrong subject.
Thanks for reposting with the right subject.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
to
> keep track of this list already because of the number of mails.
No problem.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
required to get the scripting engine functional enough? I
should be able to dedicate a couple days to this. Granted, that isn't
much but I'm hoping it will be enough.
Thanks!
--
Chris Umphress <http://www.epicvoyage.org>
___
Grub-de
dents. We
intend to have a backup method in Windows to restore the boot loader
should it be changed.
Hopefully this explains our reasoning a little better.
> -Isaac
--
Chris Umphress <http://www.epicvoyage.org>
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> Chris Umphress wrote on Friday 08 May 2009:
>> We'll overwrite the boot loader and restore the partition table if it
>> was destroyed. That would be handled from a custom, bootable live-CD
>> or thumbdrive. T
b-install). Some of the changes since
then prevent it from being fully applied but the modifications
required would be minor.
--
Chris Umphress <http://www.epicvoyage.org>
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
e, and an if statement utilizing the variables always
returns "error: false"
Am I missing something?
--
Chris Umphress <http://www.epicvoyage.org>
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Bean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Have you forgotten "insmod datehook" ?
It looks like I was. Thanks!
--
Chris Umphress <http://www.epicvoyage.org>
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
htt
nknown command 'initrd'
..and so on.
Once that happens, none of the commands work, even though I'm at the
prompt. It's like the config has broken everything.
Any ideas?
I have seen this post on the mailing list, but it doesn't seem to
match my issue.
"http://lists.
2009/7/10 Bean :
> Hi,
>
> You need to add module sh, minicmd and linux.
Thank you, thank you!!
I don't mean to presume I know what I'm talking about, but should the
Wiki entry on testing EFI be updated to reflect the fact that it needs
these extra modules?
"http://grub.enbug.org/TestingOnEFI";
"
Hi all,
Is there a resource somewhere which tells users which module a
specific command is in?
For example, which module contains the 'fakebios' command?
Thanks,
Chris
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.o
2009/7/14 Bean :
>
> The command.lst file contains this information, for example,
>
Perfect, thank you!
-c
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
While detecting other kernels, update-grub generates the following:
menuentry "Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686 (on /dev/sda12)" {
insmod ext2
set root=(hd0,12)
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 05:55:29AM EDT, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 27.10.2009, 23:23 -0400 schrieb Chris Jones:
[..]
> > Not sure this qualifies as a bug, or just incorrect setup my end.
> >
> os-prober is a seperate package. It has nothing to do with us, except
I am trying to have grub boot off a partition on a USB stick.
I issued the following command from the grub command line:
% insmod uhci
grub was hung and I had to do a hard reset.
Is this to be expected, considering that this is a fairly old system and
the BIOS knows nothing about USB devices.
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 10:16:17AM EST, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> Chris Jones wrote:
> > I am trying to have grub boot off a partition on a USB stick.
> >
> >
> You can't chainload to disk invisible by BIOS. But you can load
>
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 03:02:27PM EST, Duboucher Thomas wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
[..]
> You could do this easily using a serial null-modem cable, but I don't
> think you have one. :(
;-)
Another fascinating hardware aspect I never got down to investigating
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 03:24:31PM EST, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> Chris Jones wrote:
> >> Can you issue:
> >> debug=all
> >> insmod uhci
> >> insmod usbms
> >> debug=all
> >> ls -l
> >> debug=
>
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 03:24:31PM EST, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> Chris Jones wrote:
> >> Can you issue:
> >> debug=all
> >> insmod uhci
> >> insmod usbms
> >> debug=all
> >> ls -l
> >> debug=
&g
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 05:52:37PM EST, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> Chris Jones wrote:
[..]
> > Barring typos or omissions, the trace reveals that the perceived
> > 'hang' after issuing 'insmod uhci' is in fact grub looping ov
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 05:52:37PM EST, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> Chris Jones wrote:
[..]
> > Barring typos or omissions, the trace reveals that the perceived
> > 'hang' after issuing 'insmod uhci' is in fact grub looping ov
1 - 100 of 259 matches
Mail list logo
