ut I guess you just built binutils
with --enable-obsolete, or stayed with older binutils. Well, older
binutils are likely to be better for AOUT anyway. So what's to
prevent you using older binutils for sparc-aout?
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
e the case. Are *you*
interested in maintaining sparc-aout or sparc-coff? There are sparc
bug reports dating back to 2004 that no one has analyzed!
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
ot have to worry about it.
>
> I suspect that, just like with MIPS ECOFF support, it will be enough if
> we have BFD support, so that tools like `objcopy' and `objdump' continue
> working, and all the hairy linker infrastructure can go. But that would
> have to be c
