More readable, could consume less space.
Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio
---
grub-core/loader/arm64/xen_boot.c | 14 +++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/grub-core/loader/arm64/xen_boot.c
b/grub-core/loader/arm64/xen_boot.c
index 731f1913a..8db1d9db0 10064
The Xen image is loaded alignment, not always at "start".
Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio
---
grub-core/loader/arm64/xen_boot.c | 10 +++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/grub-core/loader/arm64/xen_boot.c
b/grub-core/loader/arm64/xen_boot.c
index 8db1d9db0..26
On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 09:39:08AM +0100, Frediano Ziglio via Grub-devel wrote:
> We need to use FOR_LIST_ELEMENTS_SAFE instead of FOR_LIST_ELEMENTS
> as single_binary_unload, called during the loop, is changing
> the list using grub_list_remove.
> Given the environment probably the old code simply
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 09:33:59AM +0100, k...@mkukri.xyz wrote:
> From: Julian Andres Klode
>
> These can be used to register a different implementation later,
> for example, when shim provides a protocol with those functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mate Kukri
For all patches Reviewed-by: Daniel Ki
On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 4:13 PM Sudhakar Kuppusamy
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 4 Jul 2025, at 7:35 PM, Frediano Ziglio via Grub-devel
> > wrote:
> >
> > More readable, could consume less space.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio
> > ---
> > grub-core/loader/arm64/xen_boot.c | 14 +++---
> > 1
> On 4 Jul 2025, at 7:36 PM, Frediano Ziglio via Grub-devel
> wrote:
>
> The Xen image is loaded alignment, not always at "start".
>
> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio
> ---
> grub-core/loader/arm64/xen_boot.c | 10 +++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/
> On 4 Jul 2025, at 7:35 PM, Frediano Ziglio via Grub-devel
> wrote:
>
> More readable, could consume less space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio
> ---
> grub-core/loader/arm64/xen_boot.c | 14 +++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/grub-core/loa
> On 4 Jul 2025, at 8:48 PM, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 4:13 PM Sudhakar Kuppusamy
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 4 Jul 2025, at 7:35 PM, Frediano Ziglio via Grub-devel
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> More readable, could consume less space.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio
>
> On 4 Jul 2025, at 2:09 PM, Frediano Ziglio via Grub-devel
> wrote:
>
> We need to use FOR_LIST_ELEMENTS_SAFE instead of FOR_LIST_ELEMENTS
> as single_binary_unload, called during the loop, is changing
> the list using grub_list_remove.
> Given the environment probably the old code simply del
On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 12:41:26PM +0530, Sudhakar Kuppusamy wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Sudhakar Kuppusamy
Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper
Daniel
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
We need to use FOR_LIST_ELEMENTS_SAFE instead of FOR_LIST_ELEMENTS
as single_binary_unload, called during the loop, is changing
the list using grub_list_remove.
Given the environment probably the old code simply deleted only the
first module on the list not freeing all the others.
Signed-off-by: F
Import libgcrypt 1.11. Changes:
* Wrote a doc on how to import.
* Fixed a memory leak
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
12 matches
Mail list logo