On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:37:35AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 01:59:02PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > Sorry for late reply...
> >
> > May I ask you to send the patches using "git send-email"?
>
> I'll try -- I'm one of the few quilt holdouts in Linux-land so I don't
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 11:52:17PM -0600, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> These are not added to grub-fs-tester because they are not generated and
> none of the filesystem tests are run on these isos. The test is to run the
> command "ls /" on the iso, and a failure is determined if the command
> times out
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 01:09:16PM +0530, Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya wrote:
> The disk sector size provided by sysfs file system considers the
> sector size of 512 irrespective of disk sector size, Thus
> causing the read by grub to an incorrect offset from what was
> originally intended.
>
> Consider
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 01:24:52AM +0100, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> * On 2/9/23 01:05, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Stumbled upon this:
> >
> > /* The size of a disk cache in 512B units. Must be at least as big as the
> >largest supported sector size, currently 16K. */
> > #define GRUB_DISK
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 05:15:48PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-01-19 at 18:31 +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> >
> > Sadly your patch set broke various builds including x86-ieee1275 one. I had
> > to do some tweaks to make it work again. You can find most important ones
> > belo
Adding another Ben's address...
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 11:36:46AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:37:35AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 01:59:02PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > Sorry for late reply...
> > >
> > > May I ask you to send the pa
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 13:09:16 +0530
Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya wrote:
> The disk sector size provided by sysfs file system considers the
> sector size of 512 irrespective of disk sector size, Thus
> causing the read by grub to an incorrect offset from what was
> originally intended.
>
> Considering
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 12:12 PM Daniel Kiper wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 05:17:13PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> > The arch specific image header details are not very useful as
> > most of the grub just looks at the PE/COFF spec parameters (PE32 magic
> > and header offset).
> >
> > Remove t
